ANNEX
‘ANNEX I
List of plants known to be susceptible to one or more subspecies of the specified pest (‘host plants’)
Acacia
Acer
Albizia julibrissin Durazz.
Alnus rhombifolia Nutt.
Amaranthus retroflexus L.
Ambrosia
Ampelopsis arborea (L.) Koehne
Ampelopsis brevipedunculata (Maxim.) Trautv.
Ampelopsis cordata Michx.
Anthyllis hermanniae L.
Artemisia
Asparagus acutifolius L.
Baccharis
Brassica
Calicotome spinosa (L.) Link
Calicotome villosa (Poiret) Link
Callicarpa americana L.
Callistemon citrinus (Curtis) Skeels
Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull
Carya
Catharanthus
Celtis occidentalis L.
Cercis canadensis L.
Cercis occidentalis Torr.
Cercis siliquastrum L.
Chamaecrista fasciculata (Michx.) Greene
Chamaesyce canescens (L.) Prokh.
Chenopodium album L.
Chionanthus
Chitalpa tashkentensis T. S. Elias & Wisura
Cistus
Citrus
Clematis cirrhosa L.
Coelorachis cylindrica (Michx.) Nash Coffea
Conium maculatum L.
Convolvulus cneorum L.
Coprosma repens A.Rich.
Coronilla glauca (L.) Batt.
Coronilla valentina L.
Cyperus eragrostis Lam.
Cytisus
Digitaria
Dimorphoteca
Diospyros kaki L.f.
Diplocyclos palmatus (L.) C.Jeffrey
Dodonaea viscosa (L.) Jacq.
Elaeagnus angustifolia L.
Encelia farinosa A. Gray ex Torr.
Eremophila maculata (Ker Gawler) F. von Müller.
Erigeron
Erodium moschatum (L.) L’Hérit.
Erysimum
Euphorbia chamaesyce L.
Euphorbia terracina L.
Euryops chrysanthemoides (DC.) B.Nord
Euryops pectinatus (L.) Cass.
Fagus crenata Blume
Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) Ronse Decr.
Fatsia japonica (Thunb.) Decne. & Planch.
Ficus carica L.
Frangula alnus Mill.
Fraxinus
Genista
Ginkgo biloba L.
Gleditsia triacanthos L.
Grevillea juniperina Br.
Hebe
Helianthus
Helichrysum
Heliotropium europaeum L.
Hemerocallis
Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex A.Juss.) Müll.Arg.
Hibiscus
Humulus scandens (Lour.) Merr.
Ilex aquifolium L.
Ilex vomitoria Sol. ex Aiton
Iva annua L.
Jacaranda mimosifolia D. Don
Juglans
Juniperus ashei J. Buchholz
Koelreuteria bipinnata Franch.
Lagerstroemia
Laurus nobilis L.
Lavandula
Ligustrum lucidum L.
Liquidambar styraciflua L.
Lonicera japonica Thunb.
Lupinus
Magnolia grandiflora L.
Mallotus paniculatus (Lam.) Müll.Arg.
Malva parviflora L.
Medicago arborea L.
Medicago sativa L.
Metrosideros
Mimosa
Modiola caroliniana (L.) G. Don
Morus
Myoporum insulare R. Br.
Myrtus communis L.
Nandina domestica Murray
Neptunia lutea (Leavenw.) Benth.
Nerium oleander L.
Olea
Osteospermum ecklonis DC.
Osteospermum fruticosum (L.) Norl.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia (L.) Planch.
Paspalum dilatatum Poir.
Pelargonium
Persea americana Mill.
Phagnalon saxatile (L.) Cass.
Phillyrea angustifolia L.
Phillyrea latifolia L.
Phlomis fruticosa L.
Phoenix reclinata Jacq.
Phoenix roebelenii O’ Brien
Pinus taeda L.
Pistacia vera L.
Plantago lanceolata L.
Platanus
Pluchea odorata (L.) Cass.
Polygala myrtifolia L.
Polygala x grandiflora Nana
Prunus
Pterospartum tridentatum (L.) Willk.
Pyrus
Quercus
Ratibida columnifera (Nutt.) Wooton & Standl.
Rhamnus alaternus L.
Rhus
Robinia pseudoacacia L.
Rosa
Rosmarinus officinalis L.
Rubus
Salvia mellifera Greene
Sambucus
Santolina chamaecyparissus L.
Sapindus saponaria L.
Sassafras
Setaria magna Griseb.
Solidago fistulosa Mill.
Solidago virgaurea L.
Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.
Spartium
Stewartia pseudocamellia
Strelitzia reginae Aiton
Streptocarpus
Symphyotrichum divaricatum (Nutt.) G.L.Nesom
Teucrium capitatum L.
Trifolium repens L.
UlexUlmus
Vaccinium
Vinca
Vitis
Westringia fruticosa (Willd.) Druce
Westringia glabra R.Br.
Xanthium strumarium L.
ANNEX II
List of plants known to be susceptible to specific subspecies of the specified pest (‘specified plants’)
Specified plants susceptible to Xylella fastidiosa subspecies fastidiosa
Acer
Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.
Calicotome spinosa (L.) Link
Cercis occidentalis Torr.
Cistus monspeliensis L.
Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck
Coffea arabica L.
Erysimum
Genista lucida L.
Juglans regia L.
Lupinus
Magnolia grandiflora L.
Malva parviflora L.
Medicago sativa L.
Metrosideros
Morus
Nerium oleander L.
Pluchea odorata (L.) Cass.
Polygala myrtifolia L.
Prunus
Rhamnus alaternus L.
Rosmarinus officinalis L.
Rubus rigidus Sm.
Rubus ursinus Cham. & Schldl.
Sambucus
Spartium junceum L.
Streptocarpus
Teucrium capitatum L.
Ulmus americana L.
Vinca major L.
Vitis
Specified plants susceptible to Xylella fastidiosa subspecies multiplex
Acacia
Acer griseum (Franch.) Pax
Acer pseudoplatanus L.
Acer rubrum L.
Alnus rhombifolia Nutt.
Ambrosia psilostachya DC.
Ambrosia trifida L.
Ampelopsis cordata Michx.
Anthyllis hermanniae L.
Artemisia
Asparagus acutifolius L.
Baccharis halimifolia L.
Calicotome spinosa (L.) Link
Calicotome villosa (Poir.) Link
Callistemon citrinus (Curtis) Skeels
Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull
Carya
Celtis occidentalis L.
Cercis canadensis L.
Cercis occidentalis Torr.
Cercis siliquastrum L.
Chionanthus
Cistus
Clematis cirrhosa L.
Convolvulus cneorum L.
Coprosma repens A. Rich.
Coronilla glauca (L.) Batt.
Coronilla valentina L.
Cytisus
Dimorphoteca
Dodonaea viscosa (L.) Jacq.
Elaeagnus angustifolia L.
Encelia farinosa Gray ex Torr.
Erigeron karvinskianus DC.
Euryops chrysanthemoides (DC.) B.Nord.
Euryops pectinatus (L.) Cass.
Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) Ronse Decr.
Ficus carica L.
Frangula alnus Mill.
Fraxinus
Genista
Ginkgo biloba L.
Gleditsia triacanthos L.
Grevillea juniperina Br.
Hebe
Helianthus
Helichrysum
Ilex aquifolium L.
Iva annua L.
Koelreuteria bipinnata Franch.
Lagerstroemia
Laurus nobilis L.
Lavandula
Liquidambar styraciflua L.
Lupinus villosus Willd.
Magnolia grandiflora L.
Medicago arborea L.
Medicago sativa L.
Metrosideros excelsa Rich.
Morus
Myrtus communis L.
Olea
Osteospermum ecklonis (DC.) Norl.
Pelargonium
Phagnalon saxatile (L.) Cass.
Phillyrea angustifolia L.
Phlomis fruticosa L.
Pistacia vera L.
Plantago lanceolata L.
Platanus
Polygala myrtifolia L.
Polygala x grandiflora Nana
Prunus
Pterospartum tridentatum (L.) Willk.
Quercus
Ratibida columnifera (Nutt.) Wooton & Standl.
Rhamnus alaternus L.
Robinia pseudoacacia L.
Rosa
Rosmarinus officinalis L.
Rubus
Salvia mellifera Greene
Sambucus
Santolina chamaecyparissus L.
Sapindus saponaria L.
Solidago virgaurea L.
Spartium
Strelitzia reginae Aiton
Ulex
Ulmus americana L.
Ulmus crassifolia Nutt.
Vaccinium
Vinca
Westringia fruticosa Guerin.
Xanthium strumarium L.
Specified plants susceptible to Xylella fastidiosa subspecies pauca
Acacia
Amaranthus retroflexus L.
Asparagus acutifolius L.
Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don
Chamaesyce canescens (L.) Prokh.
Chenopodium album L.
Cistus albidus L.
Cistus creticus L.
Citrus
Coffea
Dimorphoteca fruticosa (L.) DC.
Dodonaea viscosa (L.) Jacq.
Eremophila maculata (Ker Gawler) F. von Müller.
Erigeron
Euphorbia chamaesyce L.
Euphorbia terracina L.
Grevillea juniperina Br.
Hebe
Heliotropium europaeum L.
Hibiscus
Laurus nobilis L.
Lavandula angustifolia Mill.
Lavandula dentata L.
Lavandula stoechas L.
Myoporum insulare Br.
Myrtus communis L.
Nerium oleander L.
Olea europaea L.
Osteospermum fruticosum (L.) Norl.
Pelargonium x fragrans Willd. (syn. Pelargonium fragrans E. Mey.)
Phillyrea latifolia L.
Polygala myrtifolia L.
Prunus
Rhamnus alaternus L.
Rosmarinus officinalis L.
Spartium junceum L.
Vinca minor L.
Westringia fruticosa (Willd.) Druce
Westringia glabra Br.
ANNEX III
Infected zones referred to in Article 4(2) where containment measures set out in Articles 13 to 17 are applied
PART A
Infected zone in Italy
The infected zone of Italy includes the following areas:
1.
The province of Lecce
2.
The province of Brindisi
3.
Municipalities located in the province of Taranto:
Avetrana
Carosino
Crispiano
Faggiano
Fragagnano
Grottaglie
Leporano
Lizzano
Manduria
Martina Franca
Maruggio
Monteiasi
Montemesola
Monteparano
Pulsano
Roccaforzata
San Giorgio Ionico
San Marzano di San Giuseppe
Sava
Statte
Taranto
Torricella
4.
Municipality located in the province of Bari:
Locorotondo
PART B
Infected zone in France
The infected zone in France includes the following area:
The region of Corsica
PART C
Infected zone in Spain
The infected zone in Spain includes the following area:
The Autonomous Community of Balearic Islands
ANNEX IV
Tests for the identification of Xylella fastidiosa and its subspecies
A. Tests for the screening and identification of the presence of Xylella fastidiosa
1.
Real time PCR based on Harper et al ., 2010 (and erratum 2013);
2.
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) based on primers developed by Harper et al. 2010 (and erratum 2013);
3.
Real time PCR based on Ouyang et al ., 2013
4.
Conventional PCR based on Minsavage et al. 1994
B. Molecular tests for the identification of the subspecies of Xylella fastidiosa
1.
Multi Locus Sequence Typing (MLST) based on Yuan et al., 2010 determining all subspecies;
2.
PCR based on Hernandez-Martinez et al., 2006 determining the subspecies fastidiosa , multiplex and sandyi ;
3.
PCR based on Pooler & Hartung 1995 determining the subspecies pauca .
ANNEX V
Templates for the reporting of the results of the surveys carried out pursuant to Articles 10 and 15 in demarcated areas
PART A
Template for the report of results of statistically based annual surveys
1. Geographical location of the DA
2. Initial size of DA (ha)
3. Updated size of DA (ha)
4. Approach (E/C)
5. Zone (e.g. BZ/IZ)
6. Survey sites
7. Timing
A. Survey definition (input parameters for RiBESS+)
B. Sampling effort
C. Survey results
23. Comments
8. Target population
9. Epidemiological units
10. Detection method
11. Sampling effectiveness
12. Method sensitivity
13. Risk factors (activities, locations and areas)
14. N° epidemiological units inspected
15. N° examinations
16. N° samples
17. N° tests
18. N° other measures
19. Results
20. Notification number of the outbreaks notified, as applicable, in accordance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1715
21. Achieved Confidence level
22. Design prevalence
Host species
Area (ha or other more relevant unit))
Inspection units
Description
Units
Visual examinations
Testing
Other methods
Risk factor
Risk levels
N° of locations
Relative risks
Proportion of the host population
Positive
Negative
Undetermined
Number
Date
Instructions on how to fill in the template
Explain the assumptions for the survey design. Summarise and justify:
—
The target population, epidemiological unit and inspection units;
—
The detection method and method sensitivity;
—
The risk factor(s), indicating the risk levels and corresponding relative risks and proportions of host plant population.
For column 1:
Indicate the name of the geographical area, outbreak number or any information that allows the identification of the Demarcated Area (DA) concerned and the date when it was established.
For columns 2 and 3:
Indicate the size of the DA before the start of the survey and any relevant update.
For column 4:
Indicate the approach: Eradication (E), Containment (C). Please, include as many rows as necessary, depending on the number of DA and the approaches these areas are subject to.
For column 5:
Indicate the zone of the DA where the survey was carried out, including as many rows as necessary: Infected/infested zone (IZ) or buffer zone (BZ), using separate rows. When applicable, indicate the area of the IZ where the survey was carried out (e.g. last 5 km adjacent to the BZ, around nurseries, etc.) in different rows.
For column 6:
Indicate the survey sites, using more than one row if needed. Please, always report the surveys carried out in nurseries in a different row. When using the option ‘other’, please specify what it is:
1.
Open air (production area): 1.1 field (arable, pasture); 1.2. orchard/vineyard; 1.3. nursery; 1.4. forest;
2.
Open air (others): 2.1. private gardens; 2.2. public sites; 2.3. conservation area; 2.4. wild plants in areas other than conservation areas; 2.5. other, with specification of the particular case (e.g. garden centre, etc.);
3.
Physically closed conditions: 3.1. greenhouse; 3.2. private site, other than greenhouse; 3.3. public site, other than greenhouse; 3.4. other, with specification of the particular case (e.g. garden centre).
For column 7:
Indicate the months of the year when the surveys were carried out.
For column 8:
Indicate the chosen target population providing accordingly the list of host species and area covered. The target population is defined as the ensemble of inspection units. Its size is typically defined for agricultural areas as hectares, but it could be lots, fields, greenhouses, etc. Please justify the choice made in the underlying assumptions in column 23 (‘Comments’). Indicate the inspection units surveyed. ‘Inspection unit’ means plants, plant parts, commodities, materials, pest vectors that had been scrutinised for identifying and detecting the pests.
For column 9:
Indicate the epidemiological units surveyed, indicating its description and unit of measurement. ‘Epidemiological unit’ means a homogeneous area where the interactions between the pest, the host plants and the abiotic and biotic factors and conditions would result into the same epidemiology, should the pest be present. The epidemiological units are a subdivision of the target population which are homogenous in terms of epidemiology and which include at least one host plant. In some cases the whole host population in a region/area/country may be defined as epidemiological unit. They could be NUTS regions, urban areas, forests, rose gardens or farms, or hectares. The choice shall be justified in the underlying assumptions.
For column 10
Indicate the methods used during the survey including the number of activities in each case. Indicate with N/A when the information of certain column is not available.
For column 11:
Indicate an estimation of the sampling effectiveness. Sampling effectiveness means the probability of selecting infected plant parts from an infected plant. For vectors, it is the effectiveness of the method to capture a positive vector when it is present in the survey area. For soil, it is the effectiveness of selecting a soil sample containing the pest when the pest is present in the survey area.
For column 12:
‘Method sensitivity’ means the probability of a method to correctly detect pest presence. The method sensitivity is defined as the probability that a truly positive host tests positive. It is the multiplication of the sampling effectiveness (i.e. probability of selecting infected plant parts from an infected plant) by the diagnostic sensitivity (characterised by the visual inspection and/or laboratory test used in the identification process).
For column 13:
Provide the risk factors in different rows, using as many rows as necessary. For each risk factor indicate the risk level and corresponding relative risk and proportion of host population.
For column B:
Indicate the details of the survey. Indicate with N/A when the information of certain column is not applicable. The information to be provided in these columns is related to the information included in the column 10 ‘Detection methods’.
For column 19:
Indicate the number of samples found positive, negative or undetermined. ‘Undetermined’ are those analysed samples for which no result was obtained due to different factors (e.g. below detection level, unprocessed sample-not identified, old, etc.).
For column 20:
Indicate the outbreak notifications of the year when the survey took place. The outbreak notification number does not need to be included when the competent authority has decided that the finding is one of the cases referred to in Articles 14(2), 15(2) or 16 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031. In this case, please indicate the reason for not providing this information in column 21 (‘Comments’).
For column 21:
Indicate the sensitivity of the survey, as defined in ISPM 31. This value of the achieved confidence level of pest freedom is calculated based on the inspections (and/or samples) performed given the method sensitivity and the design prevalence.
For column 22:
Indicate the design prevalence based on a pre-survey estimate of the likely actual prevalence of the pest in the field. The design prevalence is set as a goal of the survey and corresponds to the compromise the risk managers are making between the risk of having the pest and the resources available for the survey.
PART B
Template for the report of results of surveys carried out for insect vectors of Xylella fastidiosa
1. Description of the DA
2. Approach
3. Zone
4 Vector species
5. Visual examinations
6. Type of traps (or other vector capture method (e.g.,sweep net, etc.)
7. N o of traps (or other capture method)
8. Frequency of traps checking (or other method, if applicable)
9. Timing of traps checking (or other method, if applicable)
10. N o of vector samples collected
11. N o of vectors trapped
12. N o of vectors analysed
13. N o of vector samples analysed
14. N o of positive vector samples
15. N o of negative vector samples
16. N o of undetermined vector samples
17. Comments
Name
Date of establishment
Timing
Number
Instructions on how to fill in the template
For column1:
Indicate the name of the area, outbreak number or any information that allows identifying the Demarcated Area (DA) and the date it was established.
For column 2:
Indicate: Eradication (E), Containment (C). Please include as many rows as necessary, depending on the number of DA and the approaches these areas are subject to.
For column 3:
Indicate the zone of the DA where the survey was carried out: Infected/infested zone (IZ) or buffer zone (BZ), using separate rows. When applicable, indicate the area of the IZ where the survey was carried out (e.g. last 5 km, around nurseries, etc.).
For column 4:
Indicate the list of vector species of the pest indicated in the first column, using different rows per vector.
For column 5:
Indicate only if applicable.
For column 6:
Indicate the type of vector capture method. When more than one method is used for the same vector, provide the data in separate rows.
For column 7:
Indicate the number of traps or other capture method, using a separate row per method.
For column 8:
Indicate when the traps or capture method were checked (e.g. once per week, once per month, four times per year, etc.).
For column 9:
Indicate the months of the year when the traps are checked.
For column 10:
Indicate the number of samples collected (a sample may contain several vectors).
For column 11:
Indicate the total number of vector trapped. Please include only the number of the vector of interest, no bycatch.
For column 13:
Indicate the number of vector samples analysed for the pest, applicable when a sample is composed by more than one vector.
For column 16:
The number of undetermined samples, namely samples analysed but where due to different factors no result was obtained (e.g. below detection level, etc.).
’