. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
資料由法律人 LawPlayer整理提供·UK legislation / curated by LawPlayer from legislation.gov.uk
Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1) A relevant authority must exercise its functions under this Act in the way which it considers is best calculated to contribute to the reduction of crime.
(2) In this section “ a relevant authority ” means—
(a) the National Crime Agency ,
(b) the Director of Public Prosecutions,
(c) the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland,
(d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...
(e) the Director of the Serious Fraud Office.
(f) Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, or
(g) the Financial Conduct Authority.
(3) In considering under subsection (1) the way which is best calculated to contribute to the reduction of crime a relevant authority must have regard to any guidance given to it by—
(a) in the case of the National Crime Agency , the Secretary of State,
(b) in the case of the Director of Public Prosecutions ... or the Director of the Serious Fraud Office, the Attorney General, ...
(c) in the case of the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland, the Advocate General for Northern Ireland , and
(d) in the case of Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs or the Financial Conduct Authority, the Treasury.
(4) The guidance must indicate that the reduction of crime is in general best secured by means of criminal investigations and criminal proceedings.
(5) The reference in this section to the Advocate General for Northern Ireland is to be read, before the coming into force of section 27(1) of the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002 (c. 26), as a reference to the Attorney General for Northern Ireland.
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2) Anything which the National Crime Agency is authorised or required to do under this Act (whether directly or through its staff) may be done by a person providing services under arrangements made by that Agency if the person is authorised by that Agency (whether generally or specifically) for that purpose.
(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1) Anything which the Director of Public Prosecutions is authorised or required to do under, or in relation to, Part 5 or 8 of this Act may be done by a member of his staff if the member of staff is authorised by the Director (generally or specifically) for that purpose.
(2) Anything which ... the Director of the Serious Fraud Office is authorised or required to do under, or in relation to, Part 2, 4, 5, 7 or 8 of this Act may be done by a member of his staff if the member of staff is authorised by the Director ... (generally or specifically) for that purpose.
(3) Anything which a relevant Director or a member of his staff is authorised or required to do under, or in relation to, Part 2, 4, 5 or 8 of this Act may be done by a person providing services under arrangements made by the relevant Director if the person is authorised by the relevant Director (whether generally or specifically) for that purpose.
(3A) Subsection (3) does not apply to the functions of the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland ... under section 302A , 303X , 303Z19, 303Z53 or 303Z65 .
(4) In this section “ relevant Director ” means—
(a) the Director of Public Prosecutions,
(b) the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland,
(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(d) the Director of the Serious Fraud Office.
(1) The National Crime Agency must provide a system for the accreditation of financial investigators.
(2) The system of accreditation must include provision for—
(a) the monitoring of the performance of accredited financial investigators, and
(b) the withdrawal of accreditation from any person who contravenes or fails to comply with any condition subject to which he was accredited , and
(c) securing that decisions under that system which concern—
(i) the grant or withdrawal of accreditations, or
(ii) the monitoring of the performance of accredited financial investigators,
are taken without regard to their effect on operations by the National Crime Agency or any other person .
(3) A person may be accredited—
(a) in relation to this Act;
(b) in relation to particular provisions of this Act.
(4) But the accreditation may be limited to specified purposes.
(5) A reference in this Act to an accredited financial investigator is to be construed accordingly.
(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(7) The National Crime Agency must make provision for the training of persons in—
(a) financial investigation, and
(b) the operation of this Act.
(8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1) The Crown Court must proceed under this section if the following two conditions are satisfied.
(2) The first condition is that a defendant falls within any of the following paragraphs—
(a) he is convicted of an offence or offences in proceedings before the Crown Court;
(b) he is committed to the Crown Court for sentence in respect of an offence or offences under section 3, 4 or 6 section 3, 3A, 3B, 3C, 4, 4A or 6 of the Sentencing Act any provision of sections 14 to 20 of the Sentencing Code ;
(c) he is committed to the Crown Court in respect of an offence or offences under section 70 below (committal with a view to a confiscation order being considered).
(3) The second condition is that—
(a) the prosecutor ... asks the court to proceed under this section, or
(b) the court believes it is appropriate for it to do so.
(4) The court must proceed as follows—
(a) it must decide whether the defendant has a criminal lifestyle;
(b) if it decides that he has a criminal lifestyle it must decide whether he has benefited from his general criminal conduct;
(c) if it decides that he does not have a criminal lifestyle it must decide whether he has benefited from his particular criminal conduct.
(5) If the court decides under subsection (4)(b) or (c) that the defendant has benefited from the conduct referred to it must—
(a) decide the recoverable amount, and
(b) make an order (a confiscation order) requiring him to pay that amount.
Paragraph (b) applies only if, or to the extent that, it would not be disproportionate to require the defendant to pay the recoverable amount.
(6) But the court must treat the duty in subsection (5) as a power if it believes that any victim of the conduct has at any time started or intends to start proceedings against the defendant in respect of loss, injury or damage sustained in connection with the conduct.
(6A) The court must also treat the duty in subsection (5) as a power if—
(a) an order has been made, or it believes an order may be made, against the defendant under section 4 (criminal unlawful profit orders) of the Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013 in respect of profit made by the defendant in connection with the conduct, or
(b) it believes that a person has at any time started or intends to start proceedings against the defendant under section 5 (civil unlawful profit orders) of that Act in respect of such profit.
(7) The court must decide any question arising under subsection (4) or (5) on a balance of probabilities.
(8) The first condition is not satisfied if the defendant absconds (but section 27 may apply).
(9) References in this Part to the offence (or offences) concerned are to the offence (or offences) mentioned in subsection (2).
(1) The recoverable amount for the purposes of section 6 is an amount equal to the defendant’s benefit from the conduct concerned.
(2) But if the defendant shows that the available amount is less than that benefit the recoverable amount is—
(a) the available amount, or
(b) a nominal amount, if the available amount is nil.
(3) But if section 6(6) or 6(6A) applies the recoverable amount is such amount as—
(a) the court believes is just, but
(b) does not exceed the amount found under subsection (1) or (2) (as the case may be).
(4) In calculating the defendant’s benefit from the conduct concerned for the purposes of subsection (1), the following must be ignored—
(a) any property in respect of which a recovery order is in force under section 266,
(b) any property which has been forfeited in pursuance of a forfeiture notice under section 297A or an account forfeiture notice under section 303Z9 , ...
(c) any property in respect of which a forfeiture order is in force under section 298(2) , 303O(3), 303R(3) , 303Z14(4), 303Z41(4), 303Z45(3) or 303Z60(4) , and
(d) any property which is the forfeitable property in relation to an order under section 303Q(1) or 303Z44(1) .
(5) If the court decides the available amount, it must include in the confiscation order a statement of its findings as to the matters relevant for deciding that amount.
(1) If the court is proceeding under section 6 this section applies for the purpose of—
(a) deciding whether the defendant has benefited from conduct, and
(b) deciding his benefit from the conduct.
(2) The court must—
(a) take account of conduct occurring up to the time it makes its decision;
(b) take account of property obtained up to that time.
(3) Subsection (4) applies if—
(a) the conduct concerned is general criminal conduct,
(b) a confiscation order mentioned in subsection (5) has at an earlier time been made against the defendant, and
(c) his benefit for the purposes of that order was benefit from his general criminal conduct.
(4) His benefit found at the time the last confiscation order mentioned in subsection (3)(c) was made against him must be taken for the purposes of this section to be his benefit from his general criminal conduct at that time.
(5) If the conduct concerned is general criminal conduct the court must deduct the aggregate of the following amounts—
(a) the amount ordered to be paid under each confiscation order previously made against the defendant;
(b) the amount ordered to be paid under each confiscation order previously made against him under any of the provisions listed in subsection (7).
(6) But subsection (5) does not apply to an amount which has been taken into account for the purposes of a deduction under that subsection on any earlier occasion.
(7) These are the provisions—
(a) the Drug Trafficking Offences Act 1986 (c. 32);
(b) Part 1 of the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 1987 (c. 41);
(c) Part 6 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (c. 33);
(d) the Criminal Justice (Confiscation) (Northern Ireland) Order 1990 ( S.I. 1990/2588 (N.I. 17));
(e) Part 1 of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 (c. 37);
(f) Part 1 of the Proceeds of Crime (Scotland) Act 1995 (c. 43);
(g) the Proceeds of Crime (Northern Ireland) Order 1996 (S.I. 1996/1299 (N.I. 9));
(h) Part 3 or 4 of this Act.
(8) The reference to general criminal conduct in the case of a confiscation order made under any of the provisions listed in subsection (7) is a reference to conduct in respect of which a court is required or entitled to make one or more assumptions for the purpose of assessing a person’s benefit from the conduct.
(1) For the purposes of deciding the recoverable amount, the available amount is the aggregate of—
(a) the total of the values (at the time the confiscation order is made) of all the free property then held by the defendant minus the total amount payable in pursuance of obligations which then have priority, and
(b) the total of the values (at that time) of all tainted gifts.
(2) An obligation has priority if it is an obligation of the defendant—
(a) to pay an amount due in respect of a fine or other order of a court which was imposed or made on conviction of an offence and at any time before the time the confiscation order is made, or
(b) to pay a sum which would be included among the preferential debts if the defendant’s bankruptcy had commenced on the date of the confiscation order or his winding up had been ordered on that date.
(3) “ Preferential debts ” has the meaning given by section 386 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (c. 45).
(1) If the court decides under section 6 that the defendant has a criminal lifestyle it must make the following four assumptions for the purpose of—
(a) deciding whether he has benefited from his general criminal conduct, and
(b) deciding his benefit from the conduct.
(2) The first assumption is that any property transferred to the defendant at any time after the relevant day was obtained by him—
(a) as a result of his general criminal conduct, and
(b) at the earliest time he appears to have held it.
(3) The second assumption is that any property held by the defendant at any time after the date of conviction was obtained by him—
(a) as a result of his general criminal conduct, and
(b) at the earliest time he appears to have held it.
(4) The third assumption is that any expenditure incurred by the defendant at any time after the relevant day was met from property obtained by him as a result of his general criminal conduct.
(5) The fourth assumption is that, for the purpose of valuing any property obtained (or assumed to have been obtained) by the defendant, he obtained it free of any other interests in it.
(6) But the court must not make a required assumption in relation to particular property or expenditure if—
(a) the assumption is shown to be incorrect, or
(b) there would be a serious risk of injustice if the assumption were made.
(7) If the court does not make one or more of the required assumptions it must state its reasons.
(8) The relevant day is the first day of the period of six years ending with—
(a) the day when proceedings for the offence concerned were started against the defendant, or
(b) if there are two or more offences and proceedings for them were started on different days, the earliest of those days.
(9) But if a confiscation order mentioned in section 8(3)(c) has been made against the defendant at any time during the period mentioned in subsection (8)—
(a) the relevant day is the day when the defendant’s benefit was calculated for the purposes of the last such confiscation order;
(b) the second assumption does not apply to any property which was held by him on or before the relevant day.
(10) The date of conviction is—
(a) the date on which the defendant was convicted of the offence concerned, or
(b) if there are two or more offences and the convictions were on different dates, the date of the latest.
(1) Where it appears to a court making a confiscation order that—
(a) there is property held by the defendant that is likely to be realised or otherwise used to satisfy the order, and
(b) a person other than the defendant holds, or may hold, an interest in the property,
the court may, if it thinks it appropriate to do so, determine the extent (at the time the confiscation order is made) of the defendant's interest in the property.
(2) The court must not exercise the power conferred by subsection (1) unless it gives to anyone who the court thinks is or may be a person holding an interest in the property a reasonable opportunity to make representations to it.
(3) A determination under this section is conclusive in relation to any question as to the extent of the defendant's interest in the property that arises in connection with—
(a) the realisation or destruction of the property, or the transfer of an interest in the property, with a view to satisfying the confiscation order, or
(b) any action or proceedings taken for the purposes of any such realisation or transfer.
(4) Subsection (3)—
(a) is subject to section 51(8B), and
(b) does not apply in relation to a question that arises in proceedings before the Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court.
(5) In this Part, the “extent” of the defendant's interest in property means the proportion that the value of the defendant's interest in it bears to the value of the property itself.
(1) Unless subsection (2) applies, the full amount ordered to be paid under a confiscation order must be paid on the day on which the order is made.
(2) If the court making the confiscation order is satisfied that the defendant is unable to pay the full amount on that day, it may make an order requiring whatever cannot be paid on that day to be paid—
(a) in a specified period, or
(b) in specified periods each of which relates to a specified amount.
(3) A specified period—
(a) must start with the day on which the confiscation order is made, and
(b) must not exceed three months.
(4) If—
(a) within any specified period the defendant applies to the Crown Court for that period to be extended, and
(b) the court is satisfied that, despite having made all reasonable efforts, the defendant is unable to pay the amount to which the specified period relates within that period,
the court may make an order extending the period (for all or any part or parts of the amount in question).
(5) An extended period—
(a) must start with the day on which the confiscation order is made, and
(b) must not exceed six months.
(6) An order under subsection (4)—
(a) may be made after the end of the specified period to which it relates, but
(b) must not be made after the end of the period of six months starting with the day on which the confiscation order is made.
(7) Periods specified or extended under this section must be such that, where the court believes that a defendant will by a particular day be able—
(a) to pay the amount remaining to be paid, or
(b) to pay an amount towards what remains to be paid,
that amount is required to be paid no later than that day.
(8) The court must not make an order under subsection (2) or (4) unless it gives the prosecutor an opportunity to make representations.
(1) If any amount required to be paid by a person under a confiscation order is not paid when it is required to be paid, he must pay interest on that amount for the period for which it remains unpaid.
(2) The rate of interest is the same rate as that for the time being specified in section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838 (c. 110) (interest on civil judgment debts).
(3) If—
(a) an application has been made under section 11(4) for a specified period to be extended,
(b) the application has not been determined by the court, and
(c) the period of six months starting with the day on which the confiscation order was made has not ended,
the amount on which interest is payable under this section does not include the amount to which the specified period relates.
(4) In applying this Part the amount of the interest must be treated as part of the amount to be paid under the confiscation order.
(1) If the court makes a confiscation order it must proceed as mentioned in subsections (2) and (4) in respect of the offence or offences concerned.
(2) The court must take account of the confiscation order before—
(a) it imposes a fine on the defendant, or
(b) it makes an order falling within subsection (3).
(3) These orders fall within this subsection—
(a) an order involving payment by the defendant, other than an order under section 46 of the Sentencing Code (criminal courts charge) or a priority order ;
(b) an order under section 27 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (c. 38) (forfeiture orders);
(c) an order under Chapter 4 of Part 7 of the Sentencing Code (deprivation orders);
(d) an order under section 23 or 23A of the Terrorism Act 2000 (c. 11) (forfeiture orders).
(3A) In this section “ priority order ” means any of the following—
(a) a compensation order under Chapter 2 of Part 7 of the Sentencing Code ;
(b) an order requiring payment of a surcharge under section 42 of the Sentencing Code ;
(c) an unlawful profit order under section 4 of the Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013.
(d) a slavery and trafficking reparation order under section 8 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015.
(4) Subject to subsection (2), the court must leave the confiscation order out of account in deciding the appropriate sentence for the defendant.
(5) Subsection (6) applies if—
(a) the Crown Court makes both a confiscation order and one or more priority orders against the same person in the same proceedings, and
(b) the court believes the person will not have sufficient means to satisfy all those orders in full.
(6) In such a case the court must direct that so much of the amount payable under the priority order (or orders) as it specifies is to be paid out of any sums recovered under the confiscation order; and the amount it specifies must be the amount it believes will not be recoverable because of the insufficiency of the person’s means.
(1) This section applies where the court makes a confiscation order.
(2) The court may make such order as it believes is appropriate for the purpose of ensuring that the confiscation order is effective (a “compliance order”).
(3) The court must consider whether to make a compliance order—
(a) on the making of the confiscation order, and
(b) if it does not make a compliance order then, at any later time (while the confiscation order is still in effect) on the application of the prosecutor.
(4) In considering whether to make a compliance order, the court must, in particular, consider whether any restriction or prohibition on the defendant's travel outside the United Kingdom ought to be imposed for the purpose mentioned in subsection (2).
(5) The court may discharge or vary a compliance order on an application made by—
(a) the prosecutor;
(b) any person affected by the order.
(1) If on an application under section 13A(3)(b) the Crown Court decides not to make a compliance order, the prosecutor may appeal to the Court of Appeal against the decision.
(2) The following persons may appeal to the Court of Appeal in respect of the Crown Court's decision to make, discharge or vary a compliance order—
(a) the prosecutor;
(b) any person affected by the order.
(3) On an appeal under subsection (1) or (2) the Court of Appeal may—
(a) confirm the decision, or
(b) make such order as it believes is appropriate.
(4) An appeal lies to the Supreme Court against a decision of the Court of Appeal under subsection (3).
(5) An appeal under subsection (4) lies at the instance of any person who was a party to the proceedings before the Court of Appeal.
(6) On an appeal under subsection (4) the Supreme Court may—
(a) confirm the decision of the Court of Appeal, or
(b) make such order as it believes is appropriate.
(7) In this section “ compliance order ” means an order made under section 13A.
(1) The court may—
(a) proceed under section 6 before it sentences the defendant for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned, or
(b) postpone proceedings under section 6 for a specified period.
(2) A period of postponement may be extended.
(3) A period of postponement (including one as extended) must not end after the permitted period ends.
(4) But subsection (3) does not apply if there are exceptional circumstances.
(5) The permitted period is the period of two years starting with the date of conviction.
(6) But if—
(a) the defendant appeals against his conviction for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned, and
(b) the period of three months (starting with the day when the appeal is determined or otherwise disposed of) ends after the period found under subsection (5),
the permitted period is that period of three months.
(7) A postponement or extension may be made—
(a) on application by the defendant;
(b) on application by the prosecutor ...;
(c) by the court of its own motion.
(8) If—
(a) proceedings are postponed for a period, and
(b) an application to extend the period is made before it ends,
the application may be granted even after the period ends.
(9) The date of conviction is—
(a) the date on which the defendant was convicted of the offence concerned, or
(b) if there are two or more offences and the convictions were on different dates, the date of the latest.
(10) References to appealing include references to applying under section 111 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 (c. 43) (statement of case).
(11) A confiscation order must not be quashed only on the ground that there was a defect or omission in the procedure connected with the application for or the granting of a postponement.
(12) But subsection (11) does not apply if before it made the confiscation order the court—
(a) imposed a fine on the defendant;
(b) made an order falling within section 13(3);
(c) made an order under Chapter 2 of Part 7 of the Sentencing Code (compensation orders) ;
(ca) made an order under section 42 of the Sentencing Code (orders requiring payment of surcharge);
(d) made an order under section 4 of the Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013 (unlawful profit orders) .
(1) If the court postpones proceedings under section 6 it may proceed to sentence the defendant for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned.
(2) In sentencing the defendant for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned in the postponement period the court must not—
(a) impose a fine on him,
(b) make an order falling within section 13(3), ...
(c) make an order for the payment of compensation under Chapter 2 of Part 7 of the Sentencing Code , ...
(ca) make an order for the payment of a surcharge under section 42 of the Sentencing Code , or
(d) make an unlawful profit order under section 4 of the Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013 .
(3) If the court sentences the defendant for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned in the postponement period, after that period ends it may vary the sentence by—
(a) imposing a fine on him,
(b) making an order falling within section 13(3), ...
(c) making an order for the payment of compensation under Chapter 2 of Part 7 of the Sentencing Code , ...
(ca) making an order for the payment of a surcharge under section 42 of the Sentencing Code , or
(d) making an unlawful profit order under section 4 of the Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013 .
(4) But the court may proceed under subsection (3) only within the period of 28 days which starts with the last day of the postponement period.
(5) For the purposes of—
(a) section 18(2) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968 (c. 19) (time limit for notice of appeal or of application for leave to appeal), and
(b) paragraph 1 of Schedule 3 to the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (c. 33) (time limit for notice of application for leave to refer a case under section 36 of that Act),
the sentence must be regarded as imposed or made on the day on which it is varied under subsection (3).
(6) If the court proceeds to sentence the defendant under subsection (1), section 6 has effect as if the defendant’s particular criminal conduct included conduct which constitutes offences which the court has taken into consideration in deciding his sentence for the offence or offences concerned.
(7) The postponement period is the period for which proceedings under section 6 are postponed.
(1) If the court is proceeding under section 6 in a case where section 6(3)(a) applies, the prosecutor ... must give the court a statement of information within the period the court orders.
(2) If the court is proceeding under section 6 in a case where section 6(3)(b) applies and it orders the prosecutor to give it a statement of information, the prosecutor must give it such a statement within the period the court orders.
(3) If the prosecutor ... believes the defendant has a criminal lifestyle the statement of information is a statement of matters the prosecutor ...believes are relevant in connection with deciding these issues—
(a) whether the defendant has a criminal lifestyle;
(b) whether he has benefited from his general criminal conduct;
(c) his benefit from the conduct.
(4) A statement under subsection (3) must include information the prosecutor ... believes is relevant—
(a) in connection with the making by the court of a required assumption under section 10;
(b) for the purpose of enabling the court to decide if the circumstances are such that it must not make such an assumption.
(5) If the prosecutor ... does not believe the defendant has a criminal lifestyle the statement of information is a statement of matters the prosecutor ... believes are relevant in connection with deciding these issues—
(a) whether the defendant has benefited from his particular criminal conduct;
(b) his benefit from the conduct.
(6) If the prosecutor ... gives the court a statement of information—
(a) he may at any time give the court a further statement of information;
(b) he must give the court a further statement of information if it orders him to do so, and he must give it within the period the court orders.
(6A) A statement of information (other than one to which subsection (6B) applies) must include any information known to the prosecutor which the prosecutor believes is or would be relevant for the purpose of enabling the court to decide—
(a) whether to make a determination under section 10A, or
(b) what determination to make (if the court decides to make one).
(6B) If the court has decided to make a determination under section 10A, a further statement of information under subsection (6)(b) must, if the court so orders, include specified information that is relevant to the determination.
(7) If the court makes an order under this section it may at any time vary it by making another one.
(1) If the prosecutor ... gives the court a statement of information and a copy is served on the defendant, the court may order the defendant—
(a) to indicate (within the period it orders) the extent to which he accepts each allegation in the statement, and
(b) so far as he does not accept such an allegation, to give particulars of any matters he proposes to rely on.
(2) If the defendant accepts to any extent an allegation in a statement of information the court may treat his acceptance as conclusive of the matters to which it relates for the purpose of deciding the issues referred to in section 16(3) or (5) (as the case may be).
(3) If the defendant fails in any respect to comply with an order under subsection (1) he may be treated for the purposes of subsection (2) as accepting every allegation in the statement of information apart from—
(a) any allegation in respect of which he has complied with the requirement;
(b) any allegation that he has benefited from his general or particular criminal conduct.
(4) For the purposes of this section an allegation may be accepted or particulars may be given in a manner ordered by the court.
(5) If the court makes an order under this section it may at any time vary it by making another one.
(6) No acceptance under this section that the defendant has benefited from conduct is admissible in evidence in proceedings for an offence.
(1) This section applies if—
(a) the court is proceeding under section 6 in a case where section 6(3)(a) applies, or
(b) it is proceeding under section 6 in a case where section 6(3)(b) applies or it is considering whether to proceed.
(2) For the purpose of obtaining information to help it in carrying out its functions (including functions under section 10A) the court may at any time order the defendant to give it information specified in the order.
(3) An order under this section may require all or a specified part of the information to be given in a specified manner and before a specified date.
(4) If the defendant fails without reasonable excuse to comply with an order under this section the court may draw such inference as it believes is appropriate.
(5) Subsection (4) does not affect any power of the court to deal with the defendant in respect of a failure to comply with an order under this section.
(6) If the prosecutor ... accepts to any extent an allegation made by the defendant—
(a) in giving information required by an order under this section, or
(b) in any other statement given to the court in relation to any matter relevant to deciding—
(i) the available amount under section 9, or
(ii) whether to make a determination under section 10A, or what determination to make (if the court decides to make one),
the court may treat the acceptance as conclusive of the matters to which it relates.
(7) For the purposes of this section an allegation may be accepted in a manner ordered by the court.
(8) If the court makes an order under this section it may at any time vary it by making another one.
(9) No information given under this section which amounts to an admission by the defendant that he has benefited from criminal conduct is admissible in evidence in proceedings for an offence.
(1) This section applies if the court—
(a) is considering whether to make a determination under section 10A of the extent of the defendant's interest in any property, or
(b) is deciding what determination to make (if the court has decided to make a determination under that section).
In this section “ interested person ” means a person (other than the defendant) who the court thinks is or may be a person holding an interest in the property.
(2) For the purpose of obtaining information to help it in carrying out its functions under section 10A the court may at any time order an interested person to give it information specified in the order.
(3) An order under this section may require all or a specified part of the information to be given in a specified manner and before a specified date.
(4) If an interested person fails without reasonable excuse to comply with an order under this section the court may draw such inference as it believes is appropriate.
(5) Subsection (4) does not affect any power of the court to deal with the person in respect of a failure to comply with an order under this section.
(6) If the prosecutor accepts to any extent an allegation made by an interested person—
(a) in giving information required by an order under this section, or
(b) in any other statement given to the court in relation to any matter relevant to a determination under section 10A,
the court may treat the acceptance as conclusive of the matters to which it relates.
(7) For the purposes of this section an allegation may be accepted in a manner ordered by the court.
(8) If the court makes an order under this section it may at any time vary it by making another one.
(9) No information given by a person under this section is admissible in evidence in proceedings against that person for an offence.
(1) This section applies if—
(a) the first condition in section 6 is satisfied but no court has proceeded under that section,
(b) there is evidence which was not available to the prosecutor on the relevant date,
(c) before the end of the period of six years starting with the date of conviction the prosecutor ... applies to the Crown Court to consider the evidence, and
(d) after considering the evidence the court believes it is appropriate for it to proceed under section 6.
(2) If this section applies the court must proceed under section 6, and when it does so subsections (3) to (8) below apply.
(3) If the court has already sentenced the defendant for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned, section 6 has effect as if his particular criminal conduct included conduct which constitutes offences which the court has taken into consideration in deciding his sentence for the offence or offences concerned.
(4) Section 8(2) does not apply, and the rules applying instead are that the court must—
(a) take account of conduct occurring before the relevant date;
(b) take account of property obtained before that date;
(c) take account of property obtained on or after that date if it was obtained as a result of or in connection with conduct occurring before that date.
(5) In section 10—
(a) the first and second assumptions do not apply with regard to property first held by the defendant on or after the relevant date;
(b) the third assumption does not apply with regard to expenditure incurred by him on or after that date;
(c) the fourth assumption does not apply with regard to property obtained (or assumed to have been obtained) by him on or after that date.
(6) The recoverable amount for the purposes of section 6 is such amount as—
(a) the court believes is just, but
(b) does not exceed the amount found under section 7.
(7) In arriving at the just amount the court must have regard in particular to—
(a) the amount found under section 7;
(b) any fine imposed on the defendant in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned;
(c) any order which falls within section 13(3) and has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned and has not already been taken into account by the court in deciding what is the free property held by him for the purposes of section 9;
(d) any order which has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 130 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 or Chapter 2 of Part 7 of the Sentencing Code (compensation orders) ;
(da) any order which has been made against the defendant in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 161A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 or section 42 of the Sentencing Code (orders requiring payment of surcharge);
(e) any order which has been made against the defendant in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 4 of the Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013 (unlawful profit orders) .
(8) If an order for the payment of compensation under section 130 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 or Chapter 2 of Part 7 of the Sentencing Code , a surcharge under section 161A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 or section 42 of the Sentencing Code or an unlawful profit order under section 4 of the Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013 has been made against the defendant in respect of the offence or offences concerned, section 13(5) and (6) above do not apply in relation to it .
(9) The relevant date is—
(a) if the court made a decision not to proceed under section 6, the date of the decision;
(b) if the court did not make such a decision, the date of conviction.
(10) The date of conviction is—
(a) the date on which the defendant was convicted of the offence concerned, or
(b) if there are two or more offences and the convictions were on different dates, the date of the latest.
(1) This section applies if the following two conditions are satisfied.
(2) The first condition is that in proceeding under section 6 the court has decided that—
(a) the defendant has a criminal lifestyle but has not benefited from his general criminal conduct, or
(b) the defendant does not have a criminal lifestyle and has not benefited from his particular criminal conduct.
(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(4) ... the second condition is that—
(a) there is evidence which was not available to the prosecutor when the court decided that the defendant had not benefited from his general or particular criminal conduct,
(b) before the end of the period of six years starting with the date of conviction the prosecutor ... applies to the Crown Court to consider the evidence, and
(c) after considering the evidence the court concludes that it would have decided that the defendant had benefited from his general or particular criminal conduct (as the case may be) if the evidence had been available to it.
(5) If this section applies the court—
(a) must make a fresh decision under section 6(4)(b) or (c) whether the defendant has benefited from his general or particular criminal conduct (as the case may be);
(b) may make a confiscation order under that section.
(6) Subsections (7) to (12) below apply if the court proceeds under section 6 in pursuance of this section.
(7) If the court has already sentenced the defendant for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned, section 6 has effect as if his particular criminal conduct included conduct which constitutes offences which the court has taken into consideration in deciding his sentence for the offence or offences concerned.
(8) Section 8(2) does not apply, and the rules applying instead are that the court must—
(a) take account of conduct occurring before the date of the original decision that the defendant had not benefited from his general or particular criminal conduct;
(b) take account of property obtained before that date;
(c) take account of property obtained on or after that date if it was obtained as a result of or in connection with conduct occurring before that date.
(9) In section 10—
(a) the first and second assumptions do not apply with regard to property first held by the defendant on or after the date of the original decision that the defendant had not benefited from his general or particular criminal conduct;
(b) the third assumption does not apply with regard to expenditure incurred by him on or after that date;
(c) the fourth assumption does not apply with regard to property obtained (or assumed to have been obtained) by him on or after that date.
(10) The recoverable amount for the purposes of section 6 is such amount as—
(a) the court believes is just, but
(b) does not exceed the amount found under section 7.
(11) In arriving at the just amount the court must have regard in particular to—
(a) the amount found under section 7;
(b) any fine imposed on the defendant in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned;
(c) any order which falls within section 13(3) and has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned and has not already been taken into account by the court in deciding what is the free property held by him for the purposes of section 9;
(d) any order which has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 130 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 or Chapter 2 of Part 7 of the Sentencing Code (compensation orders) ;
(da) any order which has been made against the defendant in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 161A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 or section 42 of that Code (orders requiring payment of surcharge);
(e) any order which has been made against the defendant in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 4 of the Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013 (unlawful profit orders) .
(12) If an order for the payment of compensation under section 130 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 or Chapter 2 of Part 7 of the Sentencing Code , a surcharge under section 161A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 or section 42 of the Sentencing Code or an unlawful profit order under section 4 of the Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013 has been made against the defendant in respect of the offence or offences concerned, section 13(5) and (6) above do not apply in relation to it .
(13) The date of conviction is the date found by applying section 19(10).
(1) This section applies if—
(a) a court has made a confiscation order,
(b) there is evidence which was not available to the prosecutor ... at the relevant time,
(c) the prosecutor ... believes that if the court were to find the amount of the defendant’s benefit in pursuance of this section it would exceed the relevant amount,
(d) before the end of the period of six years starting with the date of conviction the prosecutor ... applies to the Crown Court to consider the evidence, and
(e) after considering the evidence the court believes it is appropriate for it to proceed under this section.
(2) The court must make a new calculation of the defendant’s benefit from the conduct concerned, and when it does so subsections (3) to (6) below apply.
(3) If a court has already sentenced the defendant for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned section 6 has effect as if his particular criminal conduct included conduct which constitutes offences which the court has taken into consideration in deciding his sentence for the offence or offences concerned.
(4) Section 8(2) does not apply, and the rules applying instead are that the court must—
(a) take account of conduct occurring up to the time it decided the defendant’s benefit for the purposes of the confiscation order;
(b) take account of property obtained up to that time;
(c) take account of property obtained after that time if it was obtained as a result of or in connection with conduct occurring before that time.
(5) In applying section 8(5) the confiscation order must be ignored.
(6) In section 10—
(a) the first and second assumptions do not apply with regard to property first held by the defendant after the time the court decided his benefit for the purposes of the confiscation order;
(b) the third assumption does not apply with regard to expenditure incurred by him after that time;
(c) the fourth assumption does not apply with regard to property obtained (or assumed to have been obtained) by him after that time.
(7) If the amount found under the new calculation of the defendant’s benefit exceeds the relevant amount the court—
(a) must make a new calculation of the recoverable amount for the purposes of section 6, and
(b) if it exceeds the amount required to be paid under the confiscation order, may vary the order by substituting for the amount required to be paid such amount as it believes is just.
(8) In applying subsection (7)(a) the court must—
(a) take the new calculation of the defendant’s benefit;
(b) apply section 9 as if references to the time the confiscation order is made were to the time of the new calculation of the recoverable amount and as if references to the date of the confiscation order were to the date of that new calculation.
(9) In applying subsection (7)(b) the court must have regard in particular to—
(a) any fine imposed on the defendant for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned;
(b) any order which falls within section 13(3) and has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned and has not already been taken into account by the court in deciding what is the free property held by him for the purposes of section 9;
(c) any order which has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 130 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 or Chapter 2 of Part 7 of the Sentencing Code (compensation orders) ;
(ca) any order which has been made against the defendant in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 161A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 or section 42 of the Sentencing Code (orders requiring payment of surcharge);
(d) any order which has been made against the defendant in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 4 of the Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013 (unlawful profit orders) .
(10) But in applying subsection (7)(b) the court must not have regard to an order falling within subsection (9)(c) , (ca) or (d) if a court has made a direction under section 13(6).
(11) In deciding under this section whether one amount exceeds another the court must take account of any change in the value of money.
(12) The relevant time is—
(a) when the court calculated the defendant’s benefit for the purposes of the confiscation order, if this section has not applied previously;
(b) when the court last calculated the defendant’s benefit in pursuance of this section, if this section has applied previously.
(13) The relevant amount is—
(a) the amount found as the defendant’s benefit for the purposes of the confiscation order, if this section has not applied previously;
(b) the amount last found as the defendant’s benefit in pursuance of this section, if this section has applied previously.
(14) The date of conviction is the date found by applying section 19(10).
(1) This section applies if—
(a) a court has made a confiscation order,
(b) the amount required to be paid was the amount found under section 7(2), and
(c) an applicant falling within subsection (2) applies to the Crown Court to make a new calculation of the available amount.
(2) These applicants fall within this subsection—
(a) the prosecutor;
(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(c) a receiver appointed under section 50 ....
(3) In a case where this section applies the court must make the new calculation, and in doing so it must apply section 9 as if references to the time the confiscation order is made were to the time of the new calculation and as if references to the date of the confiscation order were to the date of the new calculation.
(4) If the amount found under the new calculation exceeds the relevant amount the court may vary the order by substituting for the amount required to be paid such amount as—
(a) it believes is just, but
(b) does not exceed the amount found as the defendant’s benefit from the conduct concerned.
(5) In deciding what is just the court must have regard in particular to—
(a) any fine imposed on the defendant for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned;
(b) any order which falls within section 13(3) and has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned and has not already been taken into account by the court in deciding what is the free property held by him for the purposes of section 9;
(c) any order which has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 130 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 or Chapter 2 of Part 7 of the Sentencing Code (compensation orders).
(d) any order which has been made against the defendant in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 161A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 or section 42 of the Sentencing Code (orders requiring payment of surcharge).
(6) But in deciding what is just the court must not have regard to an order falling within subsection (5)(c) or (d). if a court has made a direction under section 13(6).
(7) In deciding under this section whether one amount exceeds another the court must take account of any change in the value of money.
(8) The relevant amount is—
(a) the amount found as the available amount for the purposes of the confiscation order, if this section has not applied previously;
(b) the amount last found as the available amount in pursuance of this section, if this section has applied previously.
(9) The amount found as the defendant’s benefit from the conduct concerned is—
(a) the amount so found when the confiscation order was made, or
(b) if one or more new calculations of the defendant’s benefit have been made under section 21 the amount found on the occasion of the last such calculation.
(1) This section applies if—
(a) a court has made a confiscation order, and
(b) the defendant or the prosecutor , or a receiver appointed under section 50 ..., applies to the Crown Court to vary the order under this section.
(2) In such a case the court must calculate the available amount, and in doing so it must apply section 9 as if references to the time the confiscation order is made were to the time of the calculation and as if references to the date of the confiscation order were to the date of the calculation.
(3) If the court finds that the available amount (as so calculated) is inadequate for the payment of any amount remaining to be paid under the confiscation order it may vary the order by substituting for the amount required to be paid such smaller amount as the court believes is just.
(4) If a person has been made bankrupt or his estate has been sequestrated, or if an order for the winding up of a company has been made, the court must take into account the extent to which realisable property held by that person or that company may be distributed among creditors.
(5) The court may disregard any inadequacy which it believes is attributable (wholly or partly) to anything done by the defendant for the purpose of preserving property held by the recipient of a tainted gift from any risk of realisation under this Part.
(6) In subsection (4) “ company ” means any company which may be wound up under the Insolvency Act 1986 (c. 45) or the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 1989 (S.I. 1989/2405 (N.I. 19)).
(1) This section applies if—
(a) a court has made a confiscation order,
(b) the designated officer for a magistrates' court applies to the Crown Court for the discharge of the order, and
(c) the amount remaining to be paid under the order is less than £1,000.
(2) In such a case the court must calculate the available amount, and in doing so it must apply section 9 as if references to the time the confiscation order is made were to the time of the calculation and as if references to the date of the confiscation order were to the date of the calculation.
(3) If the court—
(a) finds that the available amount (as so calculated) is inadequate to meet the amount remaining to be paid, and
(b) is satisfied that the inadequacy is due wholly to a specified reason or a combination of specified reasons,
it may discharge the confiscation order.
(4) The specified reasons are—
(a) in a case where any of the realisable property consists of money in a currency other than sterling, that fluctuations in currency exchange rates have occurred;
(b) any reason specified by the Secretary of State by order.
(5) The Secretary of State may by order vary the amount for the time being specified in subsection (1)(c).
(6) The discharge of a confiscation order under this section does not prevent the making of an application in respect of the order under section 21(1)(d) or 22(1)(c).
(7) Where on such an application the court determines that the order should be varied under section 21(7) or (as the case may be) 22(4), the court may provide that its discharge under this section is revoked.
(1) This section applies if—
(a) a court has made a confiscation order,
(b) the designated officer for a magistrates' court applies to the Crown Court for the discharge of the order, and
(c) the amount remaining to be paid under the order is £50 or less.
(2) In such a case the court may discharge the order.
(3) The Secretary of State may by order vary the amount for the time being specified in subsection (1)(c).
(4) The discharge of a confiscation order under this section does not prevent the making of an application in respect of the order under section 21(1)(d) or 22(1)(c).
(5) Where on such an application the court determines that the order should be varied under section 21(7) or (as the case may be) 22(4), the court may provide that its discharge under this section is revoked.
(1) This section applies if—
(a) a court has made a confiscation order,
(b) the defendant dies while the order is not satisfied, and
(c) the designated officer for a magistrates' court applies to the Crown Court for the discharge of the order.
(2) The court may discharge the order if it appears to the court that—
(a) it is not possible to recover anything from the estate of the deceased for the purpose of satisfying the order to any extent, or
(b) it would not be reasonable to make any attempt, or further attempt, to recover anything from the estate of the deceased for that purpose.
(1) This section applies if—
(a) the court proceeds under section 6 in pursuance of section 19 or 20, or
(b) the prosecutor ... applies under section 21.
(2) In such a case—
(a) the prosecutor ... must give the court a statement of information within the period the court orders;
(b) section 16 applies accordingly (with appropriate modifications where the prosecutor ... applies under section 21);
(c) section 17 applies accordingly;
(d) section 18 applies as it applies in the circumstances mentioned in section 18(1).
(1) This section applies if the following two conditions are satisfied.
(2) The first condition is that a defendant falls within any of the following paragraphs—
(a) he absconds and, either before or after doing so, he is convicted of an offence or offences in proceedings before the Crown Court;
(b) he absconds after being committed to the Crown Court for sentence in respect of an offence or offences under any provision of sections 14 to 20 of the Sentencing Code ;
(c) he absconds after being committed to the Crown Court in respect of an offence or offences under section 70 below (committal with a view to a confiscation order being considered).
(3) The second condition is that—
(a) the prosecutor ... applies to the Crown Court to proceed under this section, and
(b) the court believes it is appropriate for it to do so.
(4) If this section applies the court must proceed under section 6 in the same way as it must proceed if the two conditions there mentioned are satisfied; but this is subject to subsection (5).
(5) If the court proceeds under section 6 as applied by this section, this Part has effect with these modifications—
(a) any person the court believes is likely to be affected by an order under section 6 is entitled to appear before the court and make representations;
(b) the court must not make an order under section 6 unless the prosecutor ... has taken reasonable steps to contact the defendant;
(c) section 6(9) applies as if the reference to subsection (2) were to subsection (2) of this section;
(d) sections 10, 16(4), 17 and 18 must be ignored;
(e) sections 19, 20 and 21 must be ignored while the defendant is still an absconder.
(6) Once the defendant ceases to be an absconder—
(a) section 19 has effect as if subsection (1) read—
(1) This section applies if—
(a) at a time when the first condition in section 27 was satisfied the court did not proceed under section 6,
(b) before the end of the period of six years starting with the day when the defendant ceased to be an absconder, the prosecutor applies to the Crown Court to proceed under section 6, and
(c) the court believes it is appropriate for it to do so.
(b) section 20 has effect as if subsection (4) read—
(4) The second condition is that—
(a) before the end of the period of six years starting with the day when the defendant ceased to be an absconder, the prosecutor applies to the Crown Court to reconsider whether the defendant has benefited from his general or particular criminal conduct (as the case may be), and
(b) the court believes it is appropriate for it to do so.
(c) section 21 has effect as if subsection (1) read—
(1) This section applies if—
(a) a court has made a confiscation order,
(b) the prosecutor believes that if the court were to find the amount of the defendant's benefit in pursuance of this section it would exceed the relevant amount,
(c) before the end of the period of six years starting with the day when the defendant ceased to be an absconder, the prosecutor applies to the Crown Court to proceed under this section, and
(d) the court believes it is appropriate for it to do so.
(d) the modifications set out in subsection (5)(a) to (d) of this section do not apply to proceedings that take place by virtue of section 19, 20 or 21 (as applied by this subsection).
(1) This section applies if the following two conditions are satisfied.
(2) The first condition is that—
(a) proceedings for an offence or offences are started against a defendant but are not concluded,
(b) he absconds, and
(c) the period of three months (starting with the day the court believes he absconded) has ended.
(3) The second condition is that—
(a) the prosecutor ... applies to the Crown Court to proceed under this section, and
(b) the court believes it is appropriate for it to do so.
(4) If this section applies the court must proceed under section 6 in the same way as it must proceed if the two conditions there mentioned are satisfied; but this is subject to subsection (5).
(5) If the court proceeds under section 6 as applied by this section, this Part has effect with these modifications—
(a) any person the court believes is likely to be affected by an order under section 6 is entitled to appear before the court and make representations;
(b) the court must not make an order under section 6 unless the prosecutor ... has taken reasonable steps to contact the defendant;
(c) section 6(9) applies as if the reference to subsection (2) were to subsection (2) of this section;
(d) sections 10, 16(4) and 17 to 20 must be ignored;
(e) section 21 must be ignored while the defendant is still an absconder.
(6) Once the defendant has ceased to be an absconder—
(a) section 21 has effect as if subsection (1) read—
(1) This section applies if—
(a) a court has made a confiscation order,
(b) the prosecutor believes that if the court were to find the amount of the defendant's benefit in pursuance of this section it would exceed the relevant amount,
(c) before the end of the period of six years starting with the day when the defendant ceased to be an absconder, the prosecutor applies to the Crown Court to proceed under this section, and
(d) the court believes it is appropriate for it to do so.
(b) the modifications set out in subsection (5)(a) to (d) of this section do not apply to proceedings that take place by virtue of section 21 (as applied by this subsection).
(7) If—
(a) the court makes an order under section 6 as applied by this section, and
(b) the defendant is later convicted in proceedings before the Crown Court of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned,
section 6 does not apply so far as that conviction is concerned.
(1) This section applies if—
(a) the court makes a confiscation order under section 6 as applied by section 28,
(b) the defendant ceases to be an absconder,
(c) he is convicted of an offence (or any of the offences) mentioned in section 28(2)(a),
(d) he believes that the amount required to be paid was too large (taking the circumstances prevailing when the amount was found for the purposes of the order), and
(e) before the end of the relevant period he applies to the Crown Court to consider the evidence on which his belief is based.
(2) If (after considering the evidence) the court concludes that the defendant’s belief is well founded—
(a) it must find the amount which should have been the amount required to be paid (taking the circumstances prevailing when the amount was found for the purposes of the order), and
(b) it may vary the order by substituting for the amount required to be paid such amount as it believes is just.
(3) The relevant period is the period of 28 days starting with—
(a) the date on which the defendant was convicted of the offence mentioned in section 28(2)(a), or
(b) if there are two or more offences and the convictions were on different dates, the date of the latest.
(4) But in a case where section 28(2)(a) applies to more than one offence the court must not make an order under this section unless it is satisfied that there is no possibility of any further proceedings being taken or continued in relation to any such offence in respect of which the defendant has not been convicted.
(1) Subsection (2) applies if—
(a) the court makes a confiscation order under section 6 as applied by section 28,
(b) the defendant is later tried for the offence or offences concerned and acquitted on all counts, and
(c) he applies to the Crown Court to discharge the order.
(2) In such a case the court must discharge the order.
(3) Subsection (4) applies if—
(a) the court makes a confiscation order under section 6 as applied by section 28,
(b) the defendant ceases to be an absconder,
(c) subsection (1)(b) does not apply, and
(d) he applies to the Crown Court to discharge the order.
(4) In such a case the court may discharge the order if it finds that—
(a) there has been undue delay in continuing the proceedings mentioned in section 28(2), or
(b) the prosecutor does not intend to proceed with the prosecution.
(5) If the court discharges a confiscation order under this section it may make such a consequential or incidental order as it believes is appropriate.
(1) If the Crown Court makes a confiscation order the prosecutor ... may appeal to the Court of Appeal in respect of the order.
(2) If the Crown Court decides not to make a confiscation order the prosecutor ... may appeal to the Court of Appeal against the decision.
(3) Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply to an order or decision made by virtue of section 10A, 19, 20, 27 or 28.
(4) An appeal lies to the Court of Appeal against a determination, under section 10A, of the extent of the defendant's interest in property.
(5) An appeal under subsection (4) lies at the instance of—
(a) the prosecutor;
(b) a person who the Court of Appeal thinks is or may be a person holding an interest in the property, if subsection (6) or (7) applies.
(6) This subsection applies if the person was not given a reasonable opportunity to make representations when the determination was made.
(7) This subsection applies if it appears to the Court of Appeal to be arguable that giving effect to the determination would result in a serious risk of injustice to the person.
(8) An appeal does not lie under subsection (4) where—
(a) the Court of Appeal believes that an application under section 50 is to be made by the prosecutor for the appointment of a receiver,
(b) such an application has been made but has not yet been determined, or
(c) a receiver has been appointed under section 50.
(1) On an appeal under section 31(1) the Court of Appeal may confirm, quash or vary the confiscation order.
(2) On an appeal under section 31(2) the Court of Appeal may confirm the decision, or if it believes the decision was wrong it may—
(a) itself proceed under section 6 (ignoring subsections (1) to (3)), or
(b) direct the Crown Court to proceed afresh under section 6.
(2A) On an appeal under section 31(4) the Court of Appeal may—
(a) confirm the determination, or
(b) make such order as it believes is appropriate.
(3) In proceeding afresh in pursuance of this section the Crown Court must comply with any directions the Court of Appeal may make.
(4) If a court makes or varies a confiscation order under this section or in pursuance of a direction under this section it must—
(a) have regard to any fine imposed on the defendant in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned;
(b) have regard to any order which falls within section 13(3) and has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned, unless the order has already been taken into account by a court in deciding what is the free property held by the defendant for the purposes of section 9.
(5) If the Court of Appeal proceeds under section 6 or the Crown Court proceeds afresh under that section in pursuance of a direction under this section subsections (6) to (10) apply.
(6) If a court has already sentenced the defendant for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned, section 6 has effect as if his particular criminal conduct included conduct which constitutes offences which the court has taken into consideration in deciding his sentence for the offence or offences concerned.
(7) If an order has been made against the defendant in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 130 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 or Chapter 2 of Part 7 of the Sentencing Code (compensation orders) , section 161A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 or section 42 of the Sentencing Code (orders requiring payment of surcharge) or section 4 of the Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013 (unlawful profit orders) —
(a) the court must have regard to it, and
(b) section 13(5) and (6) above do not apply in relation to it .
(8) Section 8(2) does not apply, and the rules applying instead are that the court must—
(a) take account of conduct occurring before the relevant date;
(b) take account of property obtained before that date;
(c) take account of property obtained on or after that date if it was obtained as a result of or in connection with conduct occurring before that date.
(9) In section 10—
(a) the first and second assumptions do not apply with regard to property first held by the defendant on or after the relevant date;
(b) the third assumption does not apply with regard to expenditure incurred by him on or after that date;
(c) the fourth assumption does not apply with regard to property obtained (or assumed to have been obtained) by him on or after that date.
(10) Section 26 applies as it applies in the circumstances mentioned in subsection (1) of that section.
(11) The relevant date is the date on which the Crown Court decided not to make a confiscation order.
(1) An appeal lies to the Supreme Court from a decision of the Court of Appeal on an appeal under section 31.
(2) An appeal under this section lies at the instance of—
(a) the defendant or the prosecutor (except where paragraph (b) applies);
(b) if the proceedings in the Court of Appeal were proceedings on an appeal under section 31(4), any person who was a party to those proceedings.
(3) On an appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeal to confirm, vary or make a confiscation order the Supreme Court may confirm, quash or vary the order.
(3A) On an appeal under this section from a decision under section 32(2A) the Supreme Court may—
(a) confirm the decision of the Court of Appeal, or
(b) make such order as it believes is appropriate.
(4) On an appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeal to confirm the decision of the Crown Court not to make a confiscation order or from a decision of the Court of Appeal to quash a confiscation order the Supreme Court may—
(a) confirm the decision, or
(b) direct the Crown Court to proceed afresh under section 6 if it believes the decision was wrong.
(5) In proceeding afresh in pursuance of this section the Crown Court must comply with any directions the Supreme Court may make.
(6) If a court varies a confiscation order under this section or makes a confiscation order in pursuance of a direction under this section it must—
(a) have regard to any fine imposed on the defendant in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned;
(b) have regard to any order which falls within section 13(3) and has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned, unless the order has already been taken into account by a court in deciding what is the free property held by the defendant for the purposes of section 9.
(7) If the Crown Court proceeds afresh under section 6 in pursuance of a direction under this section subsections (8) to (12) apply.
(8) If a court has already sentenced the defendant for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned, section 6 has effect as if his particular criminal conduct included conduct which constitutes offences which the court has taken into consideration in deciding his sentence for the offence or offences concerned.
(9) If an order has been made against the defendant in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 130 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 or Chapter 2 of Part 7 of the Sentencing Code (compensation orders) , section 161A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 or section 42 of the Sentencing Code (orders requiring payment of surcharge) or section 4 of the Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013 (unlawful profit orders) —
(a) the Crown Court must have regard to it, and
(b) section 13(5) and (6) above do not apply in relation to it .
(10) Section 8(2) does not apply, and the rules applying instead are that the Crown Court must—
(a) take account of conduct occurring before the relevant date;
(b) take account of property obtained before that date;
(c) take account of property obtained on or after that date if it was obtained as a result of or in connection with conduct occurring before that date.
(11) In section 10—
(a) the first and second assumptions do not apply with regard to property first held by the defendant on or after the relevant date;
(b) the third assumption does not apply with regard to expenditure incurred by him on or after that date;
(c) the fourth assumption does not apply with regard to property obtained (or assumed to have been obtained) by him on or after that date.
(12) Section 26 applies as it applies in the circumstances mentioned in subsection (1) of that section.
(13) The relevant date is—
(a) in a case where the Crown Court made a confiscation order which was quashed by the Court of Appeal, the date on which the Crown Court made the order;
(b) in any other case, the date on which the Crown Court decided not to make a confiscation order.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1) This section applies if a court—
(a) makes a confiscation order, and
(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2) Sections 129(1) to (3) and (5) and 132(1) to (4) of the Sentencing Code (functions of court as to fines and enforcing fines) apply as if the amount ordered to be paid were a fine imposed on the defendant by the court making the confiscation order.
(2A) Where a court is fixing a term of imprisonment or detention under section 129(3) of the Sentencing Code (as applied by subsection (2) above) in respect of an amount ordered to be paid under a confiscation order, the maximum terms are those specified in the second column of the Table for amounts described in the corresponding entry in the first column.
TABLE
(2B) In the application of subsection (2) of section 129 of the Sentencing Code by virtue of subsection (2) above, the reference to subsections (3) to (5) of that section is to be read as a reference to—
(a) subsections (3) and (5) of that section, and
(b) subsection (2A) above.
(2C) The Secretary of State may by order—
(a) amend subsection (2A) so as to provide for minimum terms of imprisonment or detention under section 129(3) of the Sentencing Code (as applied by subsection (2) above) in respect of amounts ordered to be paid under a confiscation order;
(b) amend the Table in subsection (2A) so as to remove, alter or replace any entry (including an entry inserted by virtue of the power in paragraph (a) of this subsection) or to add any entry.
(3) In the application of Part 3 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 (c. 43) to an amount payable under a confiscation order—
(a) ignore section 75 of that Act (power to dispense with immediate payment);
(b) such an amount is not a sum adjudged to be paid by a conviction for the purposes of section 81 (enforcement of fines imposed on young offenders) or a fine for the purposes of section 85 (remission of fines) of that Act;
(c) in section 87 of that Act ignore subsection (3) (inquiry into means).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1) Subsection (2) applies if—
(a) a warrant committing the defendant to prison or detention is issued for a default in payment of an amount ordered to be paid under a confiscation order in respect of an offence or offences, and
(b) at the time the warrant is issued the defendant is liable to serve a term of custody in respect of the offence (or any of the offences).
(2) In such a case the term of imprisonment or of detention under section 108 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 (detention of persons aged 18 to 20 for default) to be served in default of payment of the amount does not begin to run until after the term mentioned in subsection (1)(b) above.
(3) The reference in subsection (1)(b) to the term of custody the defendant is liable to serve in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) is a reference to the term of imprisonment, or detention in a young offender institution, which he is liable to serve in respect of the offence (or any of the offences).
(4) For the purposes of subsection (3) consecutive terms and terms which are wholly or partly concurrent must be treated as a single term and the following must be ignored—
(a) any sentence suspended under section 264 or 277 of the Sentencing Code (including by virtue of section 264A or 277A of that Code) which has not taken effect at the time the warrant is issued;
(b) in the case of a sentence of imprisonment passed with an order under section 47(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977 (c. 45) (sentences of imprisonment partly served and partly suspended) any part of the sentence which the defendant has not at that time been required to serve in prison;
(c) any term of imprisonment or detention fixed under section 129(3) of the Sentencing Code (term to be served in default of payment of fine etc) for which a warrant committing the defendant to prison or detention has not been issued at that time.
(5) If the defendant serves a term of imprisonment or detention in default of paying any amount due under a confiscation order, his serving that term does not prevent the confiscation order from continuing to have effect so far as any other method of enforcement is concerned.
(1) Subsection (2) applies if—
(a) a court varies a confiscation order under section 21, 22, 23, 29, 32 or 33,
(b) the effect of the variation is to vary the maximum period applicable in relation to the order under section 35(2A) , and
(c) the result is that that maximum period is less than the term of imprisonment or detention fixed in respect of the order under section 129(3) of the Sentencing Code .
(2) In such a case the court must fix a reduced term of imprisonment or detention in respect of the confiscation order under section 129(3) of the Sentencing Code in place of the term previously fixed.
(3) Subsection (4) applies if paragraphs (a) and (b) of subsection (1) apply but paragraph (c) does not.
(4) In such a case the court may amend the term of imprisonment or detention fixed in respect of the confiscation order under section 129(3) of the Sentencing Code .
(5) If the effect of section 12 is to increase the maximum period applicable in relation to a confiscation order under section 35(2A) , on the application of the prosecutor the Crown Court may amend the term of imprisonment or detention fixed in respect of the order under section 129(3) of that Code .
(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1) The Crown Court may exercise the powers conferred by section 41 if any of the following conditions is satisfied.
(2) The first condition is that—
(a) a criminal investigation has been started in England and Wales with regard to an offence, and
(b) there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the alleged offender has benefited from his criminal conduct.
(3) The second condition is that—
(a) proceedings for an offence have been started in England and Wales and not concluded, and
(b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant has benefited from his criminal conduct.
(4) The third condition is that—
(a) an application by the prosecutor ... has been made under section 19, 20, 27 or 28 and not concluded, or the court believes that such an application is to be made, and
(b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant has benefited from his criminal conduct.
(5) The fourth condition is that—
(a) an application by the prosecutor ... has been made under section 21 and not concluded, or the court believes that such an application is to be made, and
(b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the court will decide under that section that the amount found under the new calculation of the defendant’s benefit exceeds the relevant amount (as defined in that section).
(6) The fifth condition is that—
(a) an application by the prosecutor ... has been made under section 22 and not concluded, or the court believes that such an application is to be made, and
(b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the court will decide under that section that the amount found under the new calculation of the available amount exceeds the relevant amount (as defined in that section).
(7) The second condition is not satisfied if the court believes that—
(a) there has been undue delay in continuing the proceedings, or
(b) the prosecutor does not intend to proceed.
(8) If an application mentioned in the third, fourth or fifth condition has been made the condition is not satisfied if the court believes that—
(a) there has been undue delay in continuing the application, or
(b) the prosecutor ... does not intend to proceed.
(9) If the first condition is satisfied—
(a) references in this Part to the defendant are to the alleged offender;
(b) references in this Part to the prosecutor are to the person the court believes is to have conduct of any proceedings for the offence;
(c) section 77(9) has effect as if proceedings for the offence had been started against the defendant when the investigation was started.
(1) If any condition set out in section 40 is satisfied the Crown Court may make an order (a restraint order) prohibiting any specified person from dealing with any realisable property held by him.
(2) A restraint order may provide that it applies—
(a) to all realisable property held by the specified person whether or not the property is described in the order;
(b) to realisable property transferred to the specified person after the order is made.
(2A) A restraint order must be made subject to an exception enabling relevant legal aid payments to be made (a legal aid exception).
(2B) A relevant legal aid payment is a payment that the specified person is obliged to make—
(a) by regulations under section 23 or 24 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, and
(b) in connection with services provided in relation to an offence which falls within subsection (5),
whether the obligation to make the payment arises before or after the restraint order is made.
(3) A restraint order may be made subject to other exceptions, and an exception may in particular—
(a) make provision for reasonable living expenses and reasonable legal expenses;
(b) make provision for the purpose of enabling any person to carry on any trade, business, profession or occupation;
(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(4) But where an exception to a restraint order is made under subsection (3), it must not make provision for any legal expenses which—
(a) relate to an offence which falls within subsection (5), and
(b) are incurred by the defendant or by a recipient of a tainted gift.
(5) These offences fall within this subsection—
(a) the offence mentioned in section 40(2) or (3), if the first or second condition (as the case may be) is satisfied;
(b) the offence (or any of the offences) concerned, if the third, fourth or fifth condition is satisfied.
(5A) A legal aid exception—
(a) must be made subject to prescribed restrictions (if any) on—
(i) the circumstances in which payments may be made in reliance on the exception, or
(ii) the amount of the payments that may be made in reliance on the exception,
(b) must be made subject to other prescribed conditions (if any), and
(c) may be made subject to other conditions.
(5B) Any other exception to a restraint order may be made subject to conditions.
(6) Subsection (7) applies if—
(a) a court makes a restraint order, and
(b) the applicant for the order applies to the court to proceed under subsection (7) (whether as part of the application for the restraint order or at any time afterwards).
(7) The court may make such order as it believes is appropriate for the purpose of ensuring that the restraint order is effective.
(7A) Subsections (7B) and (7C) apply where the Crown Court makes a restraint order (by virtue of the first condition in section 40) as a result of a criminal investigation having been started in England and Wales with regard to an offence.
(7B) The court—
(a) must include in the order a requirement for the applicant for the order to report to the court on the progress of the investigation at such times and in such manner as the order may specify (a “reporting requirement”), and
(b) must discharge the order if proceedings for the offence are not started within a reasonable time (and this duty applies whether or not an application to discharge the order is made under section 42(3)).
(7C) The duty under subsection (7B)(a) does not apply if the court decides that, in the circumstances of the case, a reporting requirement should not be imposed, but the court—
(a) must give reasons for its decision, and
(b) may at any time vary the order so as to include a reporting requirement (and this power applies whether or not an application to vary the order is made under section 42(3)).
(7D) In considering whether to make an order under subsection (7), the court must, in particular, consider whether any restriction or prohibition on the defendant's travel outside the United Kingdom ought to be imposed for the purpose mentioned in that subsection.
(8) A restraint order does not affect property for the time being subject to a charge under any of these provisions—
(a) section 9 of the Drug Trafficking Offences Act 1986 (c. 32);
(b) section 78 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (c. 33);
(c) Article 14 of the Criminal Justice (Confiscation) (Northern Ireland) Order 1990 (S.I. 1990/2588 (N.I. 17));
(d) section 27 of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 (c. 37);
(e) Article 32 of the Proceeds of Crime (Northern Ireland) Order 1996 (S.I. 1996/1299 (N.I. 9)).
(9) Dealing with property includes removing it from England and Wales.
(10) In this section “ prescribed ” means prescribed by regulations made by the Secretary of State.
(1) A restraint order may include provision authorising the detention of any property to which it applies if the property—
(a) is seized by an appropriate officer under a relevant seizure power, or
(b) is produced to an appropriate officer in compliance with a production order under section 345.
(2) Provision under subsection (1) may, in particular—
(a) relate to specified property, to property of a specified description or to all property to which the restraint order applies;
(b) relate to property that has already been seized or produced or to property that may be seized or produced in future.
(3) “ Appropriate officer ” means—
(a) an accredited financial investigator;
(b) a constable;
(c) an officer of Revenue and Customs;
(ca) an immigration officer;
(d) a National Crime Agency officer,
(e) a member of staff of the relevant director (within the meaning of section 352(5A)).
(4) “ Relevant seizure power ” means a power to seize property which is conferred by or by virtue of—
(a) section 47C,
(b) section 352, or
(c) Part 2 or 3 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (including as applied by order under section 114(2) of that Act).
(5) The Secretary of State may by order amend the definition of “relevant seizure power”.
Cite this legislation
Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (legislation.gov.uk, OGL v3.0). Retrieved via LawPlayer, https://lawplayer.com/uk/act/ukpga-2002-29
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
本頁資料來源:legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives)·整理提供:法律人 LawPlayer· lawplayer.com