熱門推薦罰單破解實戰交通警察名師 25 年經驗,親授警察臨檢、檢舉魔人、科技執法、車禍糾紛的執法邏輯看課程介紹
購物車我的課程我的書籤免費註冊

The Armed Forces (Service Civilian Court) Rules 2009 PART 16 — RESTRICTIONS ON PUBLIC ACCESS AND REPORTING

109–1102 provisions

Proceedings in camera

109

(1) A judge advocate may order that any proceedings, or any part of any proceedings, be held in camera, if satisfied that the order is necessary or expedient in the interests of the administration of justice. (2) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (1), a judge advocate may conclude that it is necessary or expedient in the interests of the administration of justice to make an order under this rule on the ground that, if no order were made, the Director would be— (a) likely to abandon the proceedings, or (b) unlikely to bring comparable proceedings in future, for fear that information useful to an enemy might be disclosed, or national security endangered. (3) An order under this rule may be made only on oral application by a party to the proceedings, and such an application shall be made in camera unless the judge advocate otherwise directs. (4) Paragraph 1 of Schedule 10 (open court) shall not apply in relation to— (a) any proceedings, or any part of any proceedings, as respects which an order under this rule has been made; or (b) unless the judge advocate hearing the application otherwise directs, the hearing of an application for such an order.

Withholding of matter from the public in proceedings before the court

110

The court may give leave for any name or other matter given in evidence in proceedings to be withheld from the public.

Back to The Armed Forces (Service Civilian Court) Rules 2009 — full text

Provisions on this page are reproduced verbatim from official open data. See the attribution line.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 (legislation.gov.uk).