My bookmarksSign up free
Source

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/31 of 13 January 2021 on laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the minimum data quality standards and technical specifications for entering photographs, DNA profiles and dactyloscopic data in the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters and repealing Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1345 (notified under document C(2020) 9228)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/31 of 13 January 2021 on laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the minimum data quality standards and technical specifications for entering photographs, DNA profiles and dactyloscopic data in the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters and repealing Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1345 (notified under document C(2020) 9228)

Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/31 · Decision · 4 articles

Data as of 2026-07-04 · Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗

Article 1

Open ↗

The entry and storage of photographs, DNA profiles and dactyloscopic data in SIS as referred to in Article 42 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1862, shall comply with minimum data quality standards and technical specifications set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

Open ↗

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1345  ( 13 ) is hereby repealed.

Article 3

Open ↗

This Decision is addressed to the Member States, the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation, the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency.

Supplementary provisions

Minimum data quality standards and technical specifications for the use of photographs, DNA profiles and dactyloscopic data in SIS.

ANNEXSupplementary provisions

Open ↗

ANNEX Minimum data quality standards and technical specifications for the use of photographs, DNA profiles and dactyloscopic data in SIS. 1.    Dactyloscopic data 1.1.    Categories of dactyloscopic data used in SIS The following categories of dactyloscopic data may be used in SIS: (a) flat fingerprints, including flat thumb slaps and flat four-finger slaps; (b) rolled fingerprints; (c) palm prints; (d) fingermark: complete or incomplete set of fingerprints of unknown origin discovered at the scenes of terrorist offences or other serious crimes under investigation; (e) palmmark: complete or incomplete set of palm prints of unknown origin discovered at the scenes of terrorist offences or other serious crimes under investigation. 1.2.    Permitted dactyloscopic data formats Member States may transmit to Central SIS: (a) data captured using live-scan devices at the national level that are capable of capturing and segmenting up to ten individual fingerprints; rolled, flat or both; (b) ‘inked’ fingerprints and palm prints; rolled, flat or both, which are digitally scanned at the relevant quality and resolution. The Automated Fingerprint Identification System of Central SIS (CS-SIS AFIS), as defined in Article 43(2) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1862, must be compatible and interoperable with the dactyloscopic data formats mentioned under points (a) and (b). 1.3.    Minimum data quality standards and technical specifications 1.3.1.    File and compression format (‘dactyloscopic container’) The input format for the transmission of dactyloscopic data (‘dactyloscopic container’) to SIS must be compliant with the SIS NIST standard based on the ANSI/NIST  ( 1 ) binary format. A ‘SIS NIST checker’ will be established at the level of the technical support function of Central SIS (CS-SIS) to check compliance of the transmitted dactyloscopic container with the defined SIS NIST standard. Dactyloscopic containers that do not comply with the defined SIS NIST standard will be rejected by CS-SIS AFIS and will not be stored in Central SIS. If a non-compliant file is rejected by CS-SIS AFIS, CS-SIS will send an error message to the Member State that has transmitted the data. 1.3.2.    Image format and Resolution Fingerprint and palm print images referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of Section 1.1, must be of a nominal resolution of either 1 000 ppi or of 500 ppi with 256 grey levels in order to be processed by CS-SIS. 500 ppi images must be entered using the WSQ format while 1 000 ppi images must be in JPEG2000 (JP2) format. Fingermark and palmmark images referred to in points (d) and (e) of Section 1.1, must be of a resolution of 500 or 1 000 ppi in order to be processed by CS-SIS. 500 ppi images must be entered using the WSQ format while 1 000 ppi images must be in JPEG2000 (JP2) format. Lossless JPEG compression must be used for both resolutions images. 1.3.3.    Quality thresholds for the storage and use of fingerprints and palm prints images in CS-SIS AFIS Dactyloscopic images must comply with the quality thresholds laid down in the SIS Interface Control Document and Detailed Technical Specifications in order to be stored and used in CS-SIS AFIS. Member States are recommended to check the compliance with the quality thresholds of the dactyloscopic images before transmitting them to CS-SIS. Compliant dactyloscopic containers that contain dactyloscopic images on fingerprints or palm prints below the quality thresholds will not be stored in CS-SIS AFIS and will not be used for biometric searches. Dactyloscopic containers that contain dactyloscopic images rejected by CS-SIS AFIS may only be used to confirm the identity of a person in accordance with Article 43(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1862. CS-SIS will send an error message to the Member State that has transmitted the data wherever a file has been rejected by CS-SIS AFIS due to the low quality of the images. 1.3.4.    Quality thresholds for the storage and use of fingermark and palmmark images in CS-SIS AFIS Dactyloscopic images of a fingermark and palmmark must comply with the quality thresholds laid down in the SIS Interface Control Document and Technical Specifications, in order to be accepted in CS SIS AFIS. Compliant dactyloscopic containers that contain dactyloscopic images of a fingermark or palmmark below the quality threshold will not be stored in CS-SIS AFIS. CS-SIS will send an error message to the Member State that has transmitted the data when a file has been rejected by CS-SIS AFIS due to the low quality of the images. 1.4.    Biometric searches CS-SIS AFIS will provide a biometric search functionality for all types of dactyloscopic images satisfying the quality requirements established under points 1.3.3 and 1.3.4. The performance requirements and biometric accuracy for the different categories of biometric searches in CS-SIS AFIS are laid down in the SIS Interface Control Document and Detailed Technical Specifications. 2.    Photographs A minimum resolution of 480 × 600 pixels with 24 bits of colour depth must be used when entering photographs in SIS. 3.    DNA profiles The file type used to describe the DNA profile must follow the Extensible Markup Language (XML). The structure of the file must follow the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS)  ( 2 ) standard to describe the DNA profile to be stored in SIS. ( 1 )   American National Standard for Information Systems / National Institute of Standards and Technology. ( 2 )   https://www.fbi.gov/services/laboratory/biometric-analysis/codis

Other acts of the same type
Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/607 of 4 May 2020 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/1720 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in NicaraguaDecision (EU) 2020/628 of the European Central Bank of 4 May 2020 amending Decision ECB/2008/17 laying down the framework for joint Eurosystem procurement (ECB/2020/27)Decision (EU) 2020/614 of the European Central Bank of 30 April 2020 amending Decision (EU) 2019/1311 on a third series of targeted longer-term refinancing operations (ECB/2020/25)Council Decision (EU) 2020/619 of 30 April 2020 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Joint Implementation Committee established pursuant to Article 18 of the Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam on forest law enforcement, governance and trade as regards the adoption of the rules of procedure of the Joint Implementation CommitteeCouncil Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2020/584 of 28 April 2020 implementing Decision 2013/798/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Central African RepublicCouncil Decision (EU) 2020/609 of 27 April 2020 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Joint Customs Cooperation Committee established under the Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters as regards the adoption of the internal rules of procedure of the Joint Customs Cooperation CommitteeDecision (EU) 2020/637 of the European Central Bank of 27 April 2020 on accreditation procedures for manufacturers of euro secure items and euro items (ECB/2020/24) (recast)Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/590 of 24 April 2020 amending Decision (EU) 2019/784 as regards an update of relevant technical conditions applicable to the 24,25-27,5 GHz frequency band (notified under document C(2020) 2542) (Text with EEA relevance)Council Decision (EU) 2020/608 of 24 April 2020 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Korea on certain aspects of air servicesCouncil Decision (EU) 2020/1026 of 24 April 2020 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and provisional application of the Agreement on civil aviation safety between the European Union and JapanCouncil Decision (CFSP) 2020/563 of 23 April 2020 amending Decision 2013/184/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/BurmaCommission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/589 of 23 April 2020 on the adequacy of the competent authority of the Republic of South Africa pursuant to Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document C(2020) 2026) (Text with EEA relevance)

Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Contents

What to look at next