(1) Part IV of the principal Regulations (enforcement) shall have effect, with the following modifications, for the recovery of a sum for which persons are liable underPart III of the principal Regulations as applied by regulation 3 above.
(2) A reminder notice shall be served in accordance with regulation 28
(1) and (2) of those Regulations on every person against whom the application for a liability order is to be made except a co-owner who has been served under regulation 20(1) or 21(4) of those Regulations with a notice in respect of the amount concerned; and in determining whether a person is served for this purpose, regulation 22(6) of those Regulations and regulation 3(1)(b) above shall not have the effect of deeming him to have been served in a case where he has not in fact been so.
(3) A liability order may be made against one or more co-owners and their spouses or managers in respect of an amount for which they are jointly and severally liable, but may not be made against —
(a) a spouse unless it is also made against the co-owner of whom he is the spouse or,
(b) a manager unless it is also made against all the co-owners.
(4) Where a liability order has been made against more than one person in respect of an amount, subject to paragraph (9) —
(a) an attachment of earnings order may be made against one of them, or different such orders may be made against more than one;
(b) distress may be made against one or more of them; and
(c) a charging order may be made against one of them, or against more than one jointly, or different such orders may be made against more than one of them (as the circumstances require).
(5) Where a distress has been made against more than one person in respect of an amount, subject to paragraph (7) a warrant of commitment may be applied for at any time against one of them or different warrants may be applied for against more than one of them.
(6) Where distress has been made against one person only, subject to paragraph (7)a warrant of commitment may be applied for against that person.
(7) Where a liability order has been made against a co-owner or co-owners and a spouse or manager in respect of an amount, a warrant of commitment may not be applied for against the spouse or manager unless distress has been made against the co-owner of which he is the spouse or (as the case may be) such of the co-owners as are those of which he is the manager (as well as against the spouse or manager) and it appears to the authority concerned that no (or insufficient) goods of those persons can be found.
(8) Where a liability order has been made against more than one person in respect of an amount, and a warrant of commitment is issued against (or a term of imprisonment is fixed in the case of) one of them under regulation 41(3) of the principal Regulations, no steps, or no further steps, may be taken against any of them by way of attachment of earnings, distress, bankruptcy, winding up or charging of a designated dwelling in relation to the amount mentioned in regulation 41(4) of those Regulations.
(9) Where a liability order has been made against more than one person in respect of an amount —
(a) steps by way of attachment of earnings, distress, commitment, bankruptcy, winding up or charging of a designated dwelling may not be taken against a person in respect of the amount while steps by way of another of those methods are being taken against him in respect of it,
(b) subject to paragraph (10), steps by way of attachment of earnings or distress may not be taken against a person in respect of the amount while steps by way of the same method, another of those methods or the charging of a designated dwelling are being taken against one of the others in respect of it, and
(c) steps by way of the charging of a designated dwelling may not be taken against a person in respect of the amount while steps by way of attachment of earnings or distress are being taken against one of the others in respect of it.
(10) Where a liability has been made against a co-owner and his spouse in respect of an amount and in making distress against one of them goods jointly owned by both are found, paragraph (9)(b) does not preclude distress being levied against those goods with respect to that amount; but in any subsequent proceedings under regulation 41 of the principal Regulations (commitment), charges arising under Schedule 5 to those Regulations from such a distress shall be treated as charges relating to the person against whose goods the levy was intended to be made when the joint goods were found, and not as charges relating to the other.
(11) Where a liability order has been made against more than one person in respect of an amount, paragraph 2(2) of Schedule 5 to the principal Regulations shall have effect so that if a charge has arisen against one of them under head B of the Table to paragraph 1 of that Schedule as regards a levy in respect of it, no further charge may be aggregated for the purposes of regulation 39(2) of those Regulations under heads A or B in consequence of any subsequent levy or attempted levy against any of them in respect of that amount; and if a charge has arisen under head A against one of them, it shall be treated as a charge under that head with respect to the others as well as that one for the purposes of the calculation of any subsequentcharge under heads A or B against any of them.
(12) Where a liability order is made against a co-owner in respect of an amount, and also against another co-owner or a spouse or manager of a co-owner (whether at the same time as the order against the first mentioned co-owner or subsequently and whether in respect of all or part of that amount), the order made as respects all but the relevant co-owner shall not include under regulation 29(6)(b) or (7) of the principal Regulations any additional sum in respect of the costs of obtaining the order against them, but they (with the relevant co-owner) shall be treated as jointly and severally liable for the amount included in the order against the relevant co-owner in respect of costs, and the order against them shall (as regards regulation 29(6)(b) or (7) of those Regulations) be made in respect of the sum outstanding in relation to it; and for this purpose the relevant co-owner is theco-owner against whom the liability order was first made in respect of the amount, or if there are more than one such, such one of them as the court considers appropriate.
(13) Paragraph (12) is not to be construed as permitting a charging authority to apply under regulation 29(2) of the principal Regulations for a liability order against a person in respect of costs alone after an order had been made for those costs against a co-owner.