The Tax Avoidance Schemes (Prescribed Descriptions of Arrangements) (Amendment) Regulations 2004

• Citation: S.I. 2004/2429
• Sections: 5

Section 1 Citation, commencement and interpretation

(1) These Regulations may be cited as the Tax Avoidance Schemes (Prescribed Descriptions of Arrangements) (Amendment) Regulations 2004 and shall come into force on 30th September 2004.

(2) In these Regulations “the principal Regulations ” means the Tax Avoidance Schemes (Prescribed Descriptions of Arrangements) Regulations 2004 .

Section 2 Amendment of the principal Regulations

The principal Regulations are amended as follows.

Section 3 Amendment of the principal Regulations

At the end of regulation 1 (citation, commencement and interpretation) add—

(4) For the purposes of these Regulations, a premium fee, in relation to any arrangements, is a fee which is chargeable by virtue of any element of the arrangements (including the way in which they are structured) from which the tax advantage expected to be obtained arises and is a fee—

(a) the amount of which is to a significant extent attributable to that tax advantage; or

(b) which is to any extent contingent upon the obtaining of that tax advantage.

Section 4 Amendment of the principal Regulations

In regulation 2(4)(a) (interaction of Parts 1 and 2 of the Schedule to the principal Regulations) after “the Schedule” insert “other than paragraph 5A,”.

Section 5 Amendment of the principal Regulations

(1) The Schedule to the principal Regulations (arrangements prescribed for the purposes of the Regulations) is amended as follows

(2) In paragraph 1(1) after paragraph (c) add—

unless they are arrangements that are excluded by paragraph 5A

(3) After paragraph 5 insert—

Excluded arrangements

(5A) Arrangements are excluded by this paragraph if both of the following conditions are met.

The first condition is that the arrangements are such that it might reasonably be expected that no promoter, and no person connected with a promoter, of arrangements that are the same as, or substantially similar to, the arrangements in question would be able to obtain a premium fee from a person experienced in receiving services of the type being provided.

The second condition is that the tax advantage expected to be obtained under the arrangements does not arise from any element of the arrangements (including the way in which they are structured) which, disregarding any duty of confidentiality owed to any person, a promoter might reasonably be expected to wish to keep confidential from other promoters.

(4) Omit paragraph 8(5).