The Polygraph Rules 2009

• Citation: S.I. 2009/619
• Sections: 12

Section 1 Citation, commencement and interpretation

(1) These Rules may be cited as the Polygraph Rules 2009 and shall come into force on 8 th April 2009.

(2) In these Rules—

“comparison question” means a question asked for the purpose of establishing a baseline response, to which the relevant offender’s responses to the relevant questions will be compared;

“ polygraph operator ” means any employee (either temporary or permanent) of a probation provider appointed to conduct polygraph examinations;

“polygraph provider” means a person who has contracted with the Secretary of State to provide polygraph services;

“polygraph supervisor” means a person appointed by the polygraph provider to review polygraph sessions;

“post-test interview” means any interview conducted by the polygraph operator with the relevant offender during a polygraph session, following the completion of any polygraph examinations;

“pre-test interview” means any interview conducted by the polygraph operator with the relevant offender during a polygraph session, prior to the start of any polygraph examinations;

“probation provider” means a provider of probation services under section 3 of the Offender Management Act 2007 ...;

“relevant question” means a question asked for the purpose of monitoring compliance with the relevant offender’s licence conditions or improving the management of the relevant offender; and

“relevant offender” means a person to whom section 28 of the Offender Management Act 2007 applies.

Section 2 Application

These Rules apply to all polygraph sessions held pursuant to a polygraph condition.

Section 3 Qualifications of polygraph operators

(1) A polygraph operator will be suitably qualified if the polygraph operator has—

(a) completed a polygraph training programme, which includes post-conviction sex offender testing training, accredited by the American Polygraph Association; and

(b) carried out a minimum of 20 post conviction sex offender testing polygraph examinations reviewed by a polygraph supervisor .

(2) A polygraph operator will cease to be suitably qualified unless they attend at least 30 hours of continuing development training every two years . The continuing development training must cover—

(a) new developments, techniques or methods in the field of polygraphy; and

(b) current research or techniques in respect of the assessment of relevant offenders.

Section 4 Polygraph operator independence

A polygraph operator who is also an officer of a probation provider or a therapist must not conduct a polygraph session on a relevant offender in whose supervision or treatment they have been involved.

Section 5 Polygraph session requirements

(1) Polygraph sessions must be conducted by suitably qualified polygraph operators.

(2) Polygraph sessions must be electronically recorded using audiovisual recording equipment.

(3) A polygraph session must include a pre-test interview, one or more polygraph examinations and a post-test interview.

(4) A polygraph examination must include two or more comparison questions and at least two , but not more than four, relevant questions.

(4A) In setting the questions, where it is reasonably practicable to do so, the polygraph operator must liaise with the relevant offender’s probation practitioner and take the probation practitioner’s views into account when formulating the questions.

(5) The polygraph operator must compile a report of each polygraph session conducted by that polygraph operator. The report must include details of all relevant questions and answers during the polygraph examination and of the polygraph operator’s conclusions. The report must also include any disclosures made by the relevant offender during the polygraph session.

Section 6 Polygraph session requirements

(1) Before each polygraph session, an employee of the probation provider must explain to the relevant offender—

(a) the requirements of and arrangements for the polygraph session; and

(b) that anything disclosed during the session may be communicated to the probation provider responsible for that relevant offender’s supervision.

(2) Before the relevant offender’s first polygraph session, an employee of the probation provider must ask for written confirmation from the relevant offender that the matters in paragraph (1) above have been explained and that the relevant offender has understood that explanation.

(3) An employee of the probation provider must attach that written confirmation to the relevant offender’s case record.

Section 7 Polygraph supervisor

(1) A polygraph supervisor must review the polygraph sessions in accordance with the Schedule.

(2) A polygraph supervisor must meet the qualification requirements for polygraph operators in rule 3 (except where that supervisor’s only role is the review of reports produced during polygraph sessions under rule 5(5), pursuant to paragraph 2(b) of the Schedule) .

(3) A polygraph supervisor must meet each polygraph operator whose sessions are reviewed by that polygraph supervisor at least once every six months from the date these Rules come into force to discuss the work of that polygraph operator.

Section 8 Reports of polygraph session reviews

The polygraph provider is required to prepare a report for the Secretary of State at least every six months from the date these Rules come into force. The report must include—

(a) the total number of polygraph session reviews conducted by polygraph supervisors during the period covered by the report;

(b) an overview of reviews conducted during the period covered by the report;

(c) details of any polygraph sessions not conducted in accordance with these Rules or with the contract between the polygraph provider and the Secretary of State; and

(d) details of any remedial action taken to address any non-compliance with these Rules or the contract between the polygraph provider and the Secretary of State, or an explanation for any decision not to take remedial action to address non-compliance.

Section 1

The polygraph supervisor must review at least one polygraph session conducted by each polygraph operator each calendar month or, if greater, at least one out of every ten polygraph sessions (or part thereof) conducted by each polygraph operator each calendar month, starting from the date these Rules come into force.

Section 2

For each review the polygraph supervisor must—

(a) examine charts produced during the polygraph session; and

(b) examine the report of the polygraph session.

Section 3

Each review of a polygraph session by the polygraph supervisor must consider—

(a) the question formulation by the polygraph operator. In particular, the polygraph supervisor should assess—

(i) whether the polygraph operator liaised with the probation practitioner and the views of the probation practitioner were taken into account when the questions were formulated;

(ii) whether the questions were based on factors relating to the assessment, treatment or management of the relevant offender; and

(iii) whether the questions asked were sufficiently clear to allow for a polygraph indication of deception;

(b) the technique of the polygraph operator. In particular, the polygraph supervisor should assess whether the following met the applicable standards of the American Polygraph Association—

(i) the analysis by the polygraph operator of the physiological responses of the relevant offender; and

(ii) the assessments of truth or deception by the polygraph operator;

(c) whether the polygraph session was conducted in accordance with these Rules and with the contract between the polygraph provider and the Secretary of State; and

(d) whether the polygraph session met the standards of good polygraphy practice of the American Polygraph Association.

Section 4

If the polygraph supervisor identifies a failure when considering the matters in paragraph (3) of this Schedule, the polygraph supervisor must—

(a) record that failure as part of the review;

(b) inform the polygraph provider and the polygraph operator who conducted the polygraph session as soon as is reasonably practicable;

(c) propose appropriate remedial action to that polygraph operator; and

(d) arrange for additional sessions conducted by that polygraph operator to be reviewed, if the review indicates a concern about practice.