(1) This paragraph and paragraph 4 have effect for the purpose of determining the additional amount of subsidy payable under article 12(1)(c) for the relevant year beginning with 1st April 2015.
(2) The additional amount is determined as follows—
Step 1
Calculate the percentage (“the out-performance percentage”), if any, by which the performance of the authority exceeds its baseline performance in the performance period beginning with 1st April 2015.
Step 2
Look up the percentage (“the additional amount percentage”) specified in column (2) of the following Table in the row applicable to the authority’s out-performance percentage.
Step 3
Multiply the additional amount percentage by the enhanced administration subsidy.
Step 4
Repeat Steps 1 to 3 for each of the other performance periods.
Step 5
Add the amounts determined for each performance period under Step 3.
Step 6
Add the amount, if any, determined under paragraph 4.
(3) In this paragraph, “performance period” means the period of 3 months beginning with 1st April 2015, 1st July 2015, 1st October 2015 or 1st January 2016.
(4) In sub-paragraph (2), “enhanced administration subsidy” means 110 per cent. of the administration subsidy for the authority for the relevant year.
(5) References in this paragraph to “the baseline performance” of the authority in a performance period are to the amount determined in accordance with sub-paragraphs (6) to (9).
(6) For the performance period beginning with 1st April 2015 the baseline performance is the higher of the following amounts—
(a) the amount by which, in the Secretary of State’s opinion, the total payments of housing benefit made by the authority in the period of 3 months beginning with 1st April 2014 were reduced as a result of relevant activities;
(b) the average of—
(i) the amount specified in paragraph (a); and
(ii) the amount by which, in the Secretary of State’s opinion, the total payments of housing benefit made by the authority in the period of 3 months beginning with 1st April 2013 were reduced as a result of relevant activities.
(7) For the performance period beginning with 1st July 2015 the baseline performance is the higher of the following amounts—
(a) the amount by which, in the Secretary of State’s opinion, the total payments of housing benefit made by the authority in the period of 3 months beginning with 1st July 2014 were reduced as a result of relevant activities;
(b) the average of—
(i) the amount specified in paragraph (a); and
(ii) the amount by which, in the Secretary of State’s opinion, the total payments of housing benefit made by the authority in the period of 3 months beginning with 1st July 2013 were reduced as a result of relevant activities.
(8) For the performance period beginning with 1st October 2015 the baseline performance is the higher of the following amounts—
(a) the amount by which, in the Secretary of State’s opinion, the total payments of housing benefit made by the authority in the period of 3 months beginning with 1st October 2013 were reduced as a result of relevant activities;
(b) the average of—
(i) the amount specified in paragraph (a); and
(ii) the amount by which, in the Secretary of State’s opinion, the total payments of housing benefit made by the authority in the period of 3 months beginning with 1st October 2012 were reduced as a result of relevant activities.
(9) For the performance period beginning with 1st January 2016 the baseline performance is the higher of the following amounts—
(a) the amount by which, in the Secretary of State’s opinion, the total payments of housing benefit made by the authority in the period of 3 months beginning with 1st January 2014 were reduced as a result of relevant activities;
(b) the average of—
(i) the amount specified in paragraph (a); and
(ii) the amount by which, in the Secretary of State’s opinion, the total payments of housing benefit made by the authority in the period of 3 months beginning with 1st January 2013 were reduced as a result of relevant activities.